<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Corrected: The CW Basks in the Afterglow of Its Most Watched Monday of the Season</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/10/the-cw-basks-in-the-afterglow-of-its-most-watched-monday-of-the-season/33278/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/10/the-cw-basks-in-the-afterglow-of-its-most-watched-monday-of-the-season/33278/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:43:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/10/the-cw-basks-in-the-afterglow-of-its-most-watched-monday-of-the-season/33278/comment-page-1/#comment-158170</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=33278#comment-158170</guid>
		<description>Still, the ratings for GG really spiked with that Threesome action. just think how high the ratings would rise if they had an Orgy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, the ratings for GG really spiked with that Threesome action. just think how high the ratings would rise if they had an Orgy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/10/the-cw-basks-in-the-afterglow-of-its-most-watched-monday-of-the-season/33278/comment-page-1/#comment-157044</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=33278#comment-157044</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s be honest these ratings aren&#039;t that great. OTH is performing decently despite the departure of two main leads (Still down a lot from last year of course).  Gossip Girl on the other hand has been struggling to stay above the 2 million mark a lot this season even with all it&#039;s promotion. Later in the season I predict even worse ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s be honest these ratings aren&#8217;t that great. OTH is performing decently despite the departure of two main leads (Still down a lot from last year of course).  Gossip Girl on the other hand has been struggling to stay above the 2 million mark a lot this season even with all it&#8217;s promotion. Later in the season I predict even worse ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/10/the-cw-basks-in-the-afterglow-of-its-most-watched-monday-of-the-season/33278/comment-page-1/#comment-156671</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=33278#comment-156671</guid>
		<description>Errorl, the CW agrees.  There were some typos in the original release which they revised. I&#039;ve replaced the original with the corrected version above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Errorl, the CW agrees.  There were some typos in the original release which they revised. I&#8217;ve replaced the original with the corrected version above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Errol Lewis</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/10/the-cw-basks-in-the-afterglow-of-its-most-watched-monday-of-the-season/33278/comment-page-1/#comment-156602</link>
		<dc:creator>Errol Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=33278#comment-156602</guid>
		<description>Say what? One Tree Hill had a 1.9 in Adults 18-49? Though that first paragraph is filled with mistakes. They intro&#039;d both OTH and GG, but used OTH&#039;s numbers to emphasize their success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say what? One Tree Hill had a 1.9 in Adults 18-49? Though that first paragraph is filled with mistakes. They intro&#8217;d both OTH and GG, but used OTH&#8217;s numbers to emphasize their success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

