<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Apples To Oranges Are Those Nightline Ratings Comparisons?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/12/how-apples-to-oranges-are-those-nightline-ratings-comparisons/33539/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/12/how-apples-to-oranges-are-those-nightline-ratings-comparisons/33539/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: heep</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/12/how-apples-to-oranges-are-those-nightline-ratings-comparisons/33539/comment-page-1/#comment-160026</link>
		<dc:creator>heep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=33539#comment-160026</guid>
		<description>How does Kimmel have a show to begin with?  It&#039;s NEVER and mean NEVERRRR made a dollar for the network, it&#039;s not unique or engaging in any way and Kimmel himself is stiff as a board and lacks any skills away from just staring into his teleprompter.  Plus I hear he&#039;s a jerk to deal with.  I would love to see Jon Stewart slide into that spot!  Kimmel should be hosting stupid game shows on Spike, if even that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does Kimmel have a show to begin with?  It&#8217;s NEVER and mean NEVERRRR made a dollar for the network, it&#8217;s not unique or engaging in any way and Kimmel himself is stiff as a board and lacks any skills away from just staring into his teleprompter.  Plus I hear he&#8217;s a jerk to deal with.  I would love to see Jon Stewart slide into that spot!  Kimmel should be hosting stupid game shows on Spike, if even that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devdog</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/12/how-apples-to-oranges-are-those-nightline-ratings-comparisons/33539/comment-page-1/#comment-159057</link>
		<dc:creator>Devdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=33539#comment-159057</guid>
		<description>@ Roland: If the fact that Worldwide Pants owns &quot;The Late Show&quot; is such a liability in getting a good host to succeed Dave, couldn&#039;t CBS simply create a new show with a different name?  Is there some kind of contract between Worldwide Pants and CBS that says that CBS has to continue to air &quot;The Late Show&quot; even after Dave&#039;s contract expires?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Roland: If the fact that Worldwide Pants owns &#8220;The Late Show&#8221; is such a liability in getting a good host to succeed Dave, couldn&#8217;t CBS simply create a new show with a different name?  Is there some kind of contract between Worldwide Pants and CBS that says that CBS has to continue to air &#8220;The Late Show&#8221; even after Dave&#8217;s contract expires?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Worldwide Pants</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/12/how-apples-to-oranges-are-those-nightline-ratings-comparisons/33539/comment-page-1/#comment-158871</link>
		<dc:creator>Worldwide Pants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=33539#comment-158871</guid>
		<description>When Jon finished his old show on MTV (&quot;The Jon Stewart Show&quot;), Letterman was his last guest in the mid 90&#039;s.  Jon also guest hosted on the Late Late Show with Tom Snyder, and was offered to be the permanent host when Tom stepped down.  Jon declined, and was offered to Craig Kilborn.

Quite a bit of history between Dave and Jon, which is part of the reason why he is linked to succeed Dave.

I agree with Mark above, it can&#039;t be a foregone conclusion based on Craig&#039;s growing ratings and popularity, rightfully so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Jon finished his old show on MTV (&#8220;The Jon Stewart Show&#8221;), Letterman was his last guest in the mid 90&#8242;s.  Jon also guest hosted on the Late Late Show with Tom Snyder, and was offered to be the permanent host when Tom stepped down.  Jon declined, and was offered to Craig Kilborn.</p>
<p>Quite a bit of history between Dave and Jon, which is part of the reason why he is linked to succeed Dave.</p>
<p>I agree with Mark above, it can&#8217;t be a foregone conclusion based on Craig&#8217;s growing ratings and popularity, rightfully so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/12/how-apples-to-oranges-are-those-nightline-ratings-comparisons/33539/comment-page-1/#comment-158699</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=33539#comment-158699</guid>
		<description>Errol, I&#039;ll be the nitpicker who points out that Dave runs to 12:37 and Craig is 12:37 to 1:37.

J.R. and Roland, I think that until recently, Stewart probably would have been offered Late Show and accepted it, because it&#039;s the chance to succeed a legend, and he&#039;s been on the Daily Show for awhile now and might be interested in a new challenge.  However, with Craig having been beating Conan occasionally toward the end of Conan&#039;s late night run, and with his success against Jimmy, I think Craig has probably edged ahead as a slight frontrunner for Late Show when Dave steps down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Errol, I&#8217;ll be the nitpicker who points out that Dave runs to 12:37 and Craig is 12:37 to 1:37.</p>
<p>J.R. and Roland, I think that until recently, Stewart probably would have been offered Late Show and accepted it, because it&#8217;s the chance to succeed a legend, and he&#8217;s been on the Daily Show for awhile now and might be interested in a new challenge.  However, with Craig having been beating Conan occasionally toward the end of Conan&#8217;s late night run, and with his success against Jimmy, I think Craig has probably edged ahead as a slight frontrunner for Late Show when Dave steps down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/12/how-apples-to-oranges-are-those-nightline-ratings-comparisons/33539/comment-page-1/#comment-158651</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=33539#comment-158651</guid>
		<description>I have a hard time believing that Jon would want to host &quot;The Late Show&quot;.  Letterman owns the and his company would be in the drivers seat. Stewart would most likely be pressured into the typical late night talk show format and would lose a lot of what is great with Daily Show.  Its not very often that you have the typical hollywood type come in and bore the viewers to death on TDS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a hard time believing that Jon would want to host &#8220;The Late Show&#8221;.  Letterman owns the and his company would be in the drivers seat. Stewart would most likely be pressured into the typical late night talk show format and would lose a lot of what is great with Daily Show.  Its not very often that you have the typical hollywood type come in and bore the viewers to death on TDS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Errol</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/12/how-apples-to-oranges-are-those-nightline-ratings-comparisons/33539/comment-page-1/#comment-158635</link>
		<dc:creator>Errol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=33539#comment-158635</guid>
		<description>BTW, no latenight show begins at the half-hour.

ABC - NIGHTLINE airs from 11:35 PM to 12:05 AM followed by JIMMY KIMMEL LIVE from 12:05 AM to 1:05 AM.

CBS - THE LATE SHOW WITH DAVID LETTERMAN airs from 11:35 AM to 12:35 AM followed by THE LATE LATE SHOW WITH CRAIG FERGUSON from 12:35 AM to 1:35 AM.

NBC - THE TONIGHT SHOW WITH CONAN O&#039;BRIEN airs from 11:35 AM to 12:35 AM followed by LATE NIGHT WITH JIMMY FALLON from 12:35 AM to 1:35 AM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, no latenight show begins at the half-hour.</p>
<p>ABC &#8211; NIGHTLINE airs from 11:35 PM to 12:05 AM followed by JIMMY KIMMEL LIVE from 12:05 AM to 1:05 AM.</p>
<p>CBS &#8211; THE LATE SHOW WITH DAVID LETTERMAN airs from 11:35 AM to 12:35 AM followed by THE LATE LATE SHOW WITH CRAIG FERGUSON from 12:35 AM to 1:35 AM.</p>
<p>NBC &#8211; THE TONIGHT SHOW WITH CONAN O&#8217;BRIEN airs from 11:35 AM to 12:35 AM followed by LATE NIGHT WITH JIMMY FALLON from 12:35 AM to 1:35 AM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Errol</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/12/how-apples-to-oranges-are-those-nightline-ratings-comparisons/33539/comment-page-1/#comment-158630</link>
		<dc:creator>Errol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=33539#comment-158630</guid>
		<description>Bill, 

Thank you for posting the numbers. I&#039;ve said it before, and this proves the point, a latenight show loses ratings as the the hour progresses. People go to bed! 

Nightline legitimately competes in its timeslot against CBS and NBC, if it didn&#039;t you would have seen the spin doctors (PR Departments) at CBS and NBC making note of that fact long ago. This also shows us why there is a huge ratings fall after the LATE SHOW and TONIGHT show are over. Again, people go to bed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, </p>
<p>Thank you for posting the numbers. I&#8217;ve said it before, and this proves the point, a latenight show loses ratings as the the hour progresses. People go to bed! </p>
<p>Nightline legitimately competes in its timeslot against CBS and NBC, if it didn&#8217;t you would have seen the spin doctors (PR Departments) at CBS and NBC making note of that fact long ago. This also shows us why there is a huge ratings fall after the LATE SHOW and TONIGHT show are over. Again, people go to bed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R. Herbaugh</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/12/how-apples-to-oranges-are-those-nightline-ratings-comparisons/33539/comment-page-1/#comment-158605</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R. Herbaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=33539#comment-158605</guid>
		<description>Stewart would not take 1205 slot.  Pretty sure he&#039;ll be offered Letterman&#039;s spot when Letterman retires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stewart would not take 1205 slot.  Pretty sure he&#8217;ll be offered Letterman&#8217;s spot when Letterman retires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DuMont</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/12/how-apples-to-oranges-are-those-nightline-ratings-comparisons/33539/comment-page-1/#comment-158585</link>
		<dc:creator>DuMont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=33539#comment-158585</guid>
		<description>I really wish that ABC would try to craft a more sympatico lead-out to &#039;Nightline&#039;, and just cut &#039;Jimmy Kimmel&#039; loose once and for all. I&#039;m going on memory, but I do think that the &#039;Nightline&#039; follow-up program that had the best retention was &#039;Politically Incorrect&#039;. 

Since Mr. Bill Maher is unlikely to again throw in his lot with the Alphabet, ABC should make a concerted effort to try and land Mr. Jon Stewart when his Comedy Central contract comes up, and build an ABC program that can retain and possibly build on the &#039;Nightline&#039; audience, which is a very affluent, educated demographic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wish that ABC would try to craft a more sympatico lead-out to &#8216;Nightline&#8217;, and just cut &#8216;Jimmy Kimmel&#8217; loose once and for all. I&#8217;m going on memory, but I do think that the &#8216;Nightline&#8217; follow-up program that had the best retention was &#8216;Politically Incorrect&#8217;. </p>
<p>Since Mr. Bill Maher is unlikely to again throw in his lot with the Alphabet, ABC should make a concerted effort to try and land Mr. Jon Stewart when his Comedy Central contract comes up, and build an ABC program that can retain and possibly build on the &#8216;Nightline&#8217; audience, which is a very affluent, educated demographic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/11/12/how-apples-to-oranges-are-those-nightline-ratings-comparisons/33539/comment-page-1/#comment-158550</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=33539#comment-158550</guid>
		<description>very interesting... well done</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting&#8230; well done</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

