<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Ratings: Dollhouse Returns Quietly, Ugly Betty Bounces Back (33%)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:17:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terminator</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-7/#comment-174420</link>
		<dc:creator>Terminator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-174420</guid>
		<description>(continued) ...say the poll checked that same IP couldn&#039;t vote twice(the standard protection for public polls). If he changed his IP(there&#039;s a number of ways) he could vote again, but that still didn&#039;t make that particular poll less reliable than ANY OTHER public poll. And besides, using a proxy to hide your real IP is more and more common which makes checking voter&#039;s IP and thus excluding everyone that uses a proxy less and less meaningful, which means that ANY AND ALL public polls in the long run have NO CHOICE but to allow for multiple votes, which makes the whole discussion a non-issue. Still, what Tskpft wrote is worth contemplating regardless.
@AO: Your statements &quot;the show is not as “intelligent”&quot; and &quot;there were many instances where it didn’t live up to that potential&quot; really intrigues me. Can you be more specific ie give some examples? Is it possible that you could benefit from the aforementioned interview with Brian Austin Green? I can certainly recommend it: it made things a lot more clear to me, alas considering the fate of the show. After all, he was actually taking an active part in the production. Or perhaps you think of yourself as having a superiour mind in judging these things all on your own without getting a second opinion first (yes, even if you SAY that you are - and I quote - &quot;not in the habit of being a condescending jerk&quot;, it is statements like that who makes you one. This is your chance to repent and redeem yourself)?
 BTW, I did like TSCC more than I like Dollhouse, but I LOVED Buffy and enjoyed Angel so I guess that makes me intelligent, crazy and stupid all at once ie schizophrenic, or ...?
I&#039;ll be back,
Terminator</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(continued) &#8230;say the poll checked that same IP couldn&#8217;t vote twice(the standard protection for public polls). If he changed his IP(there&#8217;s a number of ways) he could vote again, but that still didn&#8217;t make that particular poll less reliable than ANY OTHER public poll. And besides, using a proxy to hide your real IP is more and more common which makes checking voter&#8217;s IP and thus excluding everyone that uses a proxy less and less meaningful, which means that ANY AND ALL public polls in the long run have NO CHOICE but to allow for multiple votes, which makes the whole discussion a non-issue. Still, what Tskpft wrote is worth contemplating regardless.<br />
@AO: Your statements &#8220;the show is not as “intelligent”&#8221; and &#8220;there were many instances where it didn’t live up to that potential&#8221; really intrigues me. Can you be more specific ie give some examples? Is it possible that you could benefit from the aforementioned interview with Brian Austin Green? I can certainly recommend it: it made things a lot more clear to me, alas considering the fate of the show. After all, he was actually taking an active part in the production. Or perhaps you think of yourself as having a superiour mind in judging these things all on your own without getting a second opinion first (yes, even if you SAY that you are &#8211; and I quote &#8211; &#8220;not in the habit of being a condescending jerk&#8221;, it is statements like that who makes you one. This is your chance to repent and redeem yourself)?<br />
 BTW, I did like TSCC more than I like Dollhouse, but I LOVED Buffy and enjoyed Angel so I guess that makes me intelligent, crazy and stupid all at once ie schizophrenic, or &#8230;?<br />
I&#8217;ll be back,<br />
Terminator</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terminator</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-7/#comment-174239</link>
		<dc:creator>Terminator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 01:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-174239</guid>
		<description>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#com-head

Hi. This is a message to all you fellow TV show fans out there, and in particular to the fans of Dollhouse and TSCC, two shows that I have some knowledge about. Sadly, I didn&#039;t stumble upon this thread: 
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/09/14/true-blood-wins-best-new-show-terminator-the-sarah-connor-chronicles-best-drama-in-twop-tubey-awards/27095
 until it was closed for comments, so this thread right here will have to do. What concerns me is the frequent apparent malice towards fans of the &quot;other&quot; show that is voiced in the comments in various threads: fans of TSCC are called &quot;crazy&quot; because they&#039;re passionate, and both sides accuse each other of being unintelligent, either overtly or covertly, by commenting on how intelligent or smart &quot;their&quot; show is (as opposed to the other). The overall impression is that a disturbing number of comments are more concerned with trashing other fans than actually saying something of substance. And it can&#039;t just be a simple matter of frustration about one&#039;s favourite show being cancelled, because if so why were the fans of Dollhouse that happened to dislike TSCC so downright mean to the grieving fans of TSCC, while Dollhouse still had a future, at least in theory? To ALL fans, on BOTH sides, I have these things to say: 
1. NEVER be HAPPY about a show being cancelled: if it hasn&#039;t happened to a show that YOU like, it&#039;s simply a matter of TIME. And then how would YOU like it if someone called you crazy or unintelligent when you&#039;re just trying to channel your feelings of loss? It&#039;s not the fans of OTHER shows that are to blaim if your favorite show gets cancelled, it&#039;s the NETWORK. Let them know how you feel and leave the fans of other shows out of it. Perhaps a solution could be some kind of fee financed channel network where canceled shows could be given a second chance: if enough people sign up for a season, it&#039;s a go. Just  a thought...
2. ANY show that passes the bar of being aired AT ALL, is BY DEFINITION, &quot;intelligent&quot;. If you doubt that, try writing one yourself. And if  intelligence was required to LIKE an &quot;intelligent&quot; show, or if by some magic wand, watching an &quot;intelligent&quot; show would make the VIEWER intelligent, than certainly this comment would be superfluous.
3. Is there not then, such a thing as MORE &quot;intelligent&quot; shows than average? Absolutely. But here&#039;s the kicker: that doesn&#039;t mean that people that doesn&#039;t LIKE them are STUPID. It only means that the particular WAY in which any given show is &quot;intelligent&quot;, simply CAN&#039;T appeal to everyone, because we&#039;re all different: You might love one &quot;intelligent&quot; show and at the same time hate another show that&#039;s just as &quot;intelligent&quot;. Because it&#039;s not the &quot;intelligence&quot; of a show that makes you like it (although it can of course add to the experience), it&#039;s your personal TASTE. Which has NOTHING to do with intelligence. Furthermore, some people LIKE the challenge of watching certain kinds of &quot;intelligent&quot; shows, while others get BORED by the very same show. And that doesn&#039;t mean that ANYONE can be sure which one&#039;s a Nobel prize winner...
 And so, to the people that &quot;didn&#039;t quite get it&quot; regarding TSCC, perhaps this interview with Brian Austin Green (who played Derek Reese) about the show and what the future plans were might shed some light on it. But a warning to the sensitive reader: he does have the audacity to call the show &quot;intelligent&quot;: his choice of word, not mine...
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&amp;id=20811
 Finally a couple of personal comments to some of the participants in the aforementioned thread:
@Bill Gorman: You need to work on your people skills. That attitude of yours will inevitably bite you in the ass, if it hasn&#039;t already. But, it&#039;s your ass, not mine. Enjoy...
@AO: You&#039;re absolutely right about people being condescending, belittling and insulting, but you&#039;re not helping the situation by swinging back like that. You should lead by example and not stoop to their level. About the merits of the poll, you&#039;re iterating what others have already said but with a little more passion, and also make a big number of the possibility that it might have allowed for unlimited votes (without a shread of evidence, I might add). As for polls where you can&#039;t vote multiple times, they certainly don&#039;t reflect the truth either. They only reflect the views of those who sees the poll, and cares much enough to vote. Even if you can&#039;t vote multiple times(again, could they?), are the merits of such polls really that much better? I think not. Please note that I&#039;m not saying that you&#039;re not right as far as numbers are concerned, I&#039;m just saying that IMHO you&#039;re a bit over the top when you use the words &quot;intelligent&quot; and &quot;dismiss&quot; like that: the poll in question does show one thing, and that is that TSCC fans cared much enough to vote at all, be it once or multiple times(again, was that even possible for the average visitor?). I recommend you to ponder what Schmacky and in particular Tskpft, wrote. Tskpft nails it. And yes, I do am aware that Tskpft SAYS he voted more than once. That doesn&#039;t mean that he actually DID. The level of the debate at that point was so infectuous it might just as well have been a provocation. Also if he did, he didn&#039;t say HOW: say the poll checked that same IP couldn&#039;t vote twice(the standard protection for public polls). If he changed his IP(there&#039;s a number of ways) he could vote again, b</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#com-head" rel="nofollow">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#com-head</a></p>
<p>Hi. This is a message to all you fellow TV show fans out there, and in particular to the fans of Dollhouse and TSCC, two shows that I have some knowledge about. Sadly, I didn&#8217;t stumble upon this thread:<br />
<a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/09/14/true-blood-wins-best-new-show-terminator-the-sarah-connor-chronicles-best-drama-in-twop-tubey-awards/27095" rel="nofollow">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/09/14/true-blood-wins-best-new-show-terminator-the-sarah-connor-chronicles-best-drama-in-twop-tubey-awards/27095</a><br />
 until it was closed for comments, so this thread right here will have to do. What concerns me is the frequent apparent malice towards fans of the &#8220;other&#8221; show that is voiced in the comments in various threads: fans of TSCC are called &#8220;crazy&#8221; because they&#8217;re passionate, and both sides accuse each other of being unintelligent, either overtly or covertly, by commenting on how intelligent or smart &#8220;their&#8221; show is (as opposed to the other). The overall impression is that a disturbing number of comments are more concerned with trashing other fans than actually saying something of substance. And it can&#8217;t just be a simple matter of frustration about one&#8217;s favourite show being cancelled, because if so why were the fans of Dollhouse that happened to dislike TSCC so downright mean to the grieving fans of TSCC, while Dollhouse still had a future, at least in theory? To ALL fans, on BOTH sides, I have these things to say:<br />
1. NEVER be HAPPY about a show being cancelled: if it hasn&#8217;t happened to a show that YOU like, it&#8217;s simply a matter of TIME. And then how would YOU like it if someone called you crazy or unintelligent when you&#8217;re just trying to channel your feelings of loss? It&#8217;s not the fans of OTHER shows that are to blaim if your favorite show gets cancelled, it&#8217;s the NETWORK. Let them know how you feel and leave the fans of other shows out of it. Perhaps a solution could be some kind of fee financed channel network where canceled shows could be given a second chance: if enough people sign up for a season, it&#8217;s a go. Just  a thought&#8230;<br />
2. ANY show that passes the bar of being aired AT ALL, is BY DEFINITION, &#8220;intelligent&#8221;. If you doubt that, try writing one yourself. And if  intelligence was required to LIKE an &#8220;intelligent&#8221; show, or if by some magic wand, watching an &#8220;intelligent&#8221; show would make the VIEWER intelligent, than certainly this comment would be superfluous.<br />
3. Is there not then, such a thing as MORE &#8220;intelligent&#8221; shows than average? Absolutely. But here&#8217;s the kicker: that doesn&#8217;t mean that people that doesn&#8217;t LIKE them are STUPID. It only means that the particular WAY in which any given show is &#8220;intelligent&#8221;, simply CAN&#8217;T appeal to everyone, because we&#8217;re all different: You might love one &#8220;intelligent&#8221; show and at the same time hate another show that&#8217;s just as &#8220;intelligent&#8221;. Because it&#8217;s not the &#8220;intelligence&#8221; of a show that makes you like it (although it can of course add to the experience), it&#8217;s your personal TASTE. Which has NOTHING to do with intelligence. Furthermore, some people LIKE the challenge of watching certain kinds of &#8220;intelligent&#8221; shows, while others get BORED by the very same show. And that doesn&#8217;t mean that ANYONE can be sure which one&#8217;s a Nobel prize winner&#8230;<br />
 And so, to the people that &#8220;didn&#8217;t quite get it&#8221; regarding TSCC, perhaps this interview with Brian Austin Green (who played Derek Reese) about the show and what the future plans were might shed some light on it. But a warning to the sensitive reader: he does have the audacity to call the show &#8220;intelligent&#8221;: his choice of word, not mine&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&#038;id=20811" rel="nofollow">http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&#038;id=20811</a><br />
 Finally a couple of personal comments to some of the participants in the aforementioned thread:<br />
@Bill Gorman: You need to work on your people skills. That attitude of yours will inevitably bite you in the ass, if it hasn&#8217;t already. But, it&#8217;s your ass, not mine. Enjoy&#8230;<br />
@AO: You&#8217;re absolutely right about people being condescending, belittling and insulting, but you&#8217;re not helping the situation by swinging back like that. You should lead by example and not stoop to their level. About the merits of the poll, you&#8217;re iterating what others have already said but with a little more passion, and also make a big number of the possibility that it might have allowed for unlimited votes (without a shread of evidence, I might add). As for polls where you can&#8217;t vote multiple times, they certainly don&#8217;t reflect the truth either. They only reflect the views of those who sees the poll, and cares much enough to vote. Even if you can&#8217;t vote multiple times(again, could they?), are the merits of such polls really that much better? I think not. Please note that I&#8217;m not saying that you&#8217;re not right as far as numbers are concerned, I&#8217;m just saying that IMHO you&#8217;re a bit over the top when you use the words &#8220;intelligent&#8221; and &#8220;dismiss&#8221; like that: the poll in question does show one thing, and that is that TSCC fans cared much enough to vote at all, be it once or multiple times(again, was that even possible for the average visitor?). I recommend you to ponder what Schmacky and in particular Tskpft, wrote. Tskpft nails it. And yes, I do am aware that Tskpft SAYS he voted more than once. That doesn&#8217;t mean that he actually DID. The level of the debate at that point was so infectuous it might just as well have been a provocation. Also if he did, he didn&#8217;t say HOW: say the poll checked that same IP couldn&#8217;t vote twice(the standard protection for public polls). If he changed his IP(there&#8217;s a number of ways) he could vote again, b</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-7/#comment-171352</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 03:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-171352</guid>
		<description>The last two episodes of dollhouse were basically the best of the two seasons so far.  I think Fox is making a mistake by not giving a bigger run.  They also ditched Terminator, and Firefly.  Why is it that Fox puts these on then ditches them.  Would rather that TNT put them on and keep em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last two episodes of dollhouse were basically the best of the two seasons so far.  I think Fox is making a mistake by not giving a bigger run.  They also ditched Terminator, and Firefly.  Why is it that Fox puts these on then ditches them.  Would rather that TNT put them on and keep em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-7/#comment-171219</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-171219</guid>
		<description>theveiledone, &quot;they&quot; also used obviously fake email addresses.

As for why they would air Dollhouse, it&#039;s December. The episodes have already been paid for, might as well air them to make back a bit of their money. It&#039;s also a nice gesture to some of the craziest fans around. Maybe this will keep them from being quite as annoying as they would have been?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theveiledone, &#8220;they&#8221; also used obviously fake email addresses.</p>
<p>As for why they would air Dollhouse, it&#8217;s December. The episodes have already been paid for, might as well air them to make back a bit of their money. It&#8217;s also a nice gesture to some of the craziest fans around. Maybe this will keep them from being quite as annoying as they would have been?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-7/#comment-171212</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-171212</guid>
		<description>@Allie,
Ugly Betty airs on ABC, not FOX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Allie,<br />
Ugly Betty airs on ABC, not FOX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-7/#comment-171198</link>
		<dc:creator>Allie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-171198</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a small part of me that holds out hope that Dollhouse will get a last minute reprieve. The show is criminally underrated and has been undeservedly ignored by viewers, which is a damn shame as it is quitee possibly one of the best shows on TV at the moment. 
One thing I am curious about; why have Fox moved Ugly Betty (which, in my opinion is starting to get a little stale; to a better day and timeslot in order to improve ratings, but never bothered doing the same with Dollhouse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a small part of me that holds out hope that Dollhouse will get a last minute reprieve. The show is criminally underrated and has been undeservedly ignored by viewers, which is a damn shame as it is quitee possibly one of the best shows on TV at the moment.<br />
One thing I am curious about; why have Fox moved Ugly Betty (which, in my opinion is starting to get a little stale; to a better day and timeslot in order to improve ratings, but never bothered doing the same with Dollhouse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-7/#comment-171080</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-171080</guid>
		<description>I think fridays will improve by January. ABC&#039;s Shark Tank/Wife Swap combo should do OK, but its better than having Betty die in that slot. FOX&#039;s combo of House/Bones repeats and Kitchen Nightmares is likely to do better than Dollhouse did. Its very likely FOX returns Lie to Me to fridays at 8 by March. As for CBS, with Numb3rs expected to wrap up in February, I think CBS&#039;s best bet is moving The Good Wife to fridays at 10. I know its doing great on Tuesdays, but maybe if its already doing good Tuesdays, CBS can use it to help fridays out. And with NBC, theyre liekly to but reality series or Traumas 6 eps on fridays once L&amp;O ends. CW and Smallville are doing well so hopefully they can stiuck with that combo until May.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think fridays will improve by January. ABC&#8217;s Shark Tank/Wife Swap combo should do OK, but its better than having Betty die in that slot. FOX&#8217;s combo of House/Bones repeats and Kitchen Nightmares is likely to do better than Dollhouse did. Its very likely FOX returns Lie to Me to fridays at 8 by March. As for CBS, with Numb3rs expected to wrap up in February, I think CBS&#8217;s best bet is moving The Good Wife to fridays at 10. I know its doing great on Tuesdays, but maybe if its already doing good Tuesdays, CBS can use it to help fridays out. And with NBC, theyre liekly to but reality series or Traumas 6 eps on fridays once L&amp;O ends. CW and Smallville are doing well so hopefully they can stiuck with that combo until May.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theveiledone</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-7/#comment-171023</link>
		<dc:creator>theveiledone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-171023</guid>
		<description>Maybe they are friends or sisters. I do that all the time with my sister where we both post. In any case, doesn&#039;t make what they said not true.

Also, why would Fox air DH when reruns of Bones and House get better ratings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they are friends or sisters. I do that all the time with my sister where we both post. In any case, doesn&#8217;t make what they said not true.</p>
<p>Also, why would Fox air DH when reruns of Bones and House get better ratings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-7/#comment-170807</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170807</guid>
		<description>pisher says:

&quot;Hell, I watched every single episode of Fassbinder&#039;s &#039;Berlin Alexanderplatz.&#039;&quot;

Yeah, but did you do it in one sitting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pisher says:</p>
<p>&#8220;Hell, I watched every single episode of Fassbinder&#8217;s &#8216;Berlin Alexanderplatz.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, but did you do it in one sitting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chaos amoeba</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-7/#comment-170785</link>
		<dc:creator>chaos amoeba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 01:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170785</guid>
		<description>@forg: Well, Julia(2) and polly might just be different personalities of the same doll.  She wouldn&#039;t even know that she&#039;s using the same connection to post on the same message board.  I wonder if they have wireless in the Houses...

Just sayin&#039;... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@forg: Well, Julia(2) and polly might just be different personalities of the same doll.  She wouldn&#8217;t even know that she&#8217;s using the same connection to post on the same message board.  I wonder if they have wireless in the Houses&#8230;</p>
<p>Just sayin&#8217;&#8230; <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tvmegafan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-7/#comment-170781</link>
		<dc:creator>tvmegafan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 01:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170781</guid>
		<description>I LOVE DOLLHOUSE!!! Fox can take a fall to hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE DOLLHOUSE!!! Fox can take a fall to hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forg</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-7/#comment-170766</link>
		<dc:creator>forg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170766</guid>
		<description>No show got a 2.0 :(

On another note, I hope some readers would realize that it is futile to post here using various names because the site admin tracks IP addresses, they will find out. And doing that is really pathetic, come on</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No show got a 2.0 <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>On another note, I hope some readers would realize that it is futile to post here using various names because the site admin tracks IP addresses, they will find out. And doing that is really pathetic, come on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natalie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-7/#comment-170706</link>
		<dc:creator>natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170706</guid>
		<description>Pisher could almost be Uschi.  You&#039;re not Uschi, are you, Pisher?  Has the world gotten that weird?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pisher could almost be Uschi.  You&#8217;re not Uschi, are you, Pisher?  Has the world gotten that weird?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-7/#comment-170704</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170704</guid>
		<description>DW, if I got to pick who was banned, there&#039;d be several people you&#039;d never see on this website again. Unfortunately, that&#039;s not my job. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DW, if I got to pick who was banned, there&#8217;d be several people you&#8217;d never see on this website again. Unfortunately, that&#8217;s not my job. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ren</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-7/#comment-170703</link>
		<dc:creator>Ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170703</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so glad people have noticed how good Ugly Betty is this season, the quality has picked up a lot which almost gives off the feeling of season 1 again :)

I really hope the move does Betty better, the show deserves it and with such wonderful and loyal fans I can only hope so!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so glad people have noticed how good Ugly Betty is this season, the quality has picked up a lot which almost gives off the feeling of season 1 again <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I really hope the move does Betty better, the show deserves it and with such wonderful and loyal fans I can only hope so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DW</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-7/#comment-170702</link>
		<dc:creator>DW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170702</guid>
		<description>Julia, if pisher is a known troll on this website, is there a reason he&#039;s not banned?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia, if pisher is a known troll on this website, is there a reason he&#8217;s not banned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-7/#comment-170700</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170700</guid>
		<description>don: &quot;SLUT&quot;...

Okay...I&#039;m gonna go out on a limb and decare you a troll.

chaos amoeba: &quot;Curiously, I think Jed wrote some of the strongest episodes…&quot;

I agree. I think Jed and Maurissa actually had a better handle on the material--or, to be fair, the way I think the material should have been presented--than Whedon. They wrote Epitaph One and they also wrote the second season episode &quot;Belonging&quot; in which Adelle finally calls a spade a spade and admits that what they&#039;re doing to people just might be a tiny bit morally questionable. And also calls Topher out on the fact that he is a kind of monster.

Oh, and on the whole Faith the Vampire Slayer thing--even if Joss was willing to go back to it, which I doubt, Eliza is on record as being through with that role. (Though I suppose a big paycheck might possibly lure her back, who knows.) But I think almost any other TV show is a more likely possibility for Eliza than &quot;Faith&quot;.

I want to see SMG on an awesome edgy cable show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don: &#8220;SLUT&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Okay&#8230;I&#8217;m gonna go out on a limb and decare you a troll.</p>
<p>chaos amoeba: &#8220;Curiously, I think Jed wrote some of the strongest episodes…&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree. I think Jed and Maurissa actually had a better handle on the material&#8211;or, to be fair, the way I think the material should have been presented&#8211;than Whedon. They wrote Epitaph One and they also wrote the second season episode &#8220;Belonging&#8221; in which Adelle finally calls a spade a spade and admits that what they&#8217;re doing to people just might be a tiny bit morally questionable. And also calls Topher out on the fact that he is a kind of monster.</p>
<p>Oh, and on the whole Faith the Vampire Slayer thing&#8211;even if Joss was willing to go back to it, which I doubt, Eliza is on record as being through with that role. (Though I suppose a big paycheck might possibly lure her back, who knows.) But I think almost any other TV show is a more likely possibility for Eliza than &#8220;Faith&#8221;.</p>
<p>I want to see SMG on an awesome edgy cable show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob R</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170699</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170699</guid>
		<description>More viewers watched a typical afternoon airing of the cancelled &quot;Guiding Light&quot; on CBS (typical audience 2.2 million) than watched a prime time, all new episode of &quot;Dollhouse&quot; this weekend.  That is why the show is cancelled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More viewers watched a typical afternoon airing of the cancelled &#8220;Guiding Light&#8221; on CBS (typical audience 2.2 million) than watched a prime time, all new episode of &#8220;Dollhouse&#8221; this weekend.  That is why the show is cancelled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170697</link>
		<dc:creator>don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170697</guid>
		<description>forget it guys that dollhouse SLUT is gone and never should have gone on the fox lineup to start with but its a goner thank god now if you have a hunky stud  guy playing the part im there so guys get a life the show sucks and cya to a SHIT SHOW  with a SLUT who played the part she must have slept with the producers of the show to get the part that WHORE now she has to find a real job but if it comes to spreding her legs thats the only way she can stay employed ONCE A SLUT ALWAYS A SLUT I HOPE SHE GETS THE CLAP HAHAHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>forget it guys that dollhouse SLUT is gone and never should have gone on the fox lineup to start with but its a goner thank god now if you have a hunky stud  guy playing the part im there so guys get a life the show sucks and cya to a SHIT SHOW  with a SLUT who played the part she must have slept with the producers of the show to get the part that WHORE now she has to find a real job but if it comes to spreding her legs thats the only way she can stay employed ONCE A SLUT ALWAYS A SLUT I HOPE SHE GETS THE CLAP HAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170696</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 15:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170696</guid>
		<description>usedtolovecoco, I don&#039;t think the second Julia was trying impersonate me, it was just someone trying to think of a girl&#039;s name to use. The comment after by &quot;polly&quot; has the same IP address. Ironic that she is taking offense to someone else being called a troll when she obviously is one herself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>usedtolovecoco, I don&#8217;t think the second Julia was trying impersonate me, it was just someone trying to think of a girl&#8217;s name to use. The comment after by &#8220;polly&#8221; has the same IP address. Ironic that she is taking offense to someone else being called a troll when she obviously is one herself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smallville</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170692</link>
		<dc:creator>Smallville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 15:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170692</guid>
		<description>John from dec 5 11:01am, the statement came from EOnline and that place always gets the info from the entwork and are never wrong. They state what the network wants stated. And the CW stated they want a season 10! So Shut it! And u dont know nothing about Smallville Tom Welling has been signed on for a 10th season since Season 8 and since he just became an exectutive producer on the show, i really doubt he would give up on the show because he is tired. If he was tired of it he wouldnt have become a co-producer.

John dont make a comment ever again or you&#039;ll just ruin ur life by telling lies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John from dec 5 11:01am, the statement came from EOnline and that place always gets the info from the entwork and are never wrong. They state what the network wants stated. And the CW stated they want a season 10! So Shut it! And u dont know nothing about Smallville Tom Welling has been signed on for a 10th season since Season 8 and since he just became an exectutive producer on the show, i really doubt he would give up on the show because he is tired. If he was tired of it he wouldnt have become a co-producer.</p>
<p>John dont make a comment ever again or you&#8217;ll just ruin ur life by telling lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usedtolovecoco</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170684</link>
		<dc:creator>usedtolovecoco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170684</guid>
		<description>&quot;Whedon Fans&quot; is a generalization that&#039;s just not accurate. The majority that I&#039;ve talked to aren&#039;t crazy about Dollhouse, or they just tolerate it. I say nice things about the show when they&#039;re warranted (Enver is a genius actor who should be on the big screen), but overall I&#039;m not sad to see it go.

Some people just go out of their way to troll Whedon fans, even going so far as to post in a blog entry under 3 different names so that it sounds like someone&#039;s agreeing with them.

Look at the two people posting as Julia above. The first one, the one that has the conversation with Robert, and calls pisher out on being a troll, is the real one. The second &quot;Julia&quot; has the opposite opinion, and if you hover the mouse over her name, you&#039;ll see the link goes to &quot;http://none&quot;.

Classy. Is faking someone&#039;s identity enough for a ban?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Whedon Fans&#8221; is a generalization that&#8217;s just not accurate. The majority that I&#8217;ve talked to aren&#8217;t crazy about Dollhouse, or they just tolerate it. I say nice things about the show when they&#8217;re warranted (Enver is a genius actor who should be on the big screen), but overall I&#8217;m not sad to see it go.</p>
<p>Some people just go out of their way to troll Whedon fans, even going so far as to post in a blog entry under 3 different names so that it sounds like someone&#8217;s agreeing with them.</p>
<p>Look at the two people posting as Julia above. The first one, the one that has the conversation with Robert, and calls pisher out on being a troll, is the real one. The second &#8220;Julia&#8221; has the opposite opinion, and if you hover the mouse over her name, you&#8217;ll see the link goes to &#8220;http://none&#8221;.</p>
<p>Classy. Is faking someone&#8217;s identity enough for a ban?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170670</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170670</guid>
		<description>The first 2/3 of the first episode of Dollhouse last night was great. After that it was ok, but nothing too special. Still mad about TSCC, so I am glad Dollhouse is getting crappy ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first 2/3 of the first episode of Dollhouse last night was great. After that it was ok, but nothing too special. Still mad about TSCC, so I am glad Dollhouse is getting crappy ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Sleven</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170665</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Sleven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 06:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170665</guid>
		<description>Dollhouse took an unexpected turn for the better last night, it&#039;s just too little too late. I wish it was like this from the beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dollhouse took an unexpected turn for the better last night, it&#8217;s just too little too late. I wish it was like this from the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nostalgia time</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170662</link>
		<dc:creator>nostalgia time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 06:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170662</guid>
		<description>Remember that vicious flame war here last summer over Summer Glau&#039;s appearance on Dollhouse, like it was going to be some humongous TV event that would reshape the course of the show?  Kinda seems silly in retrospect, huh?  The episode with Summer Glau in it dropped a share point from the Dollhouse episode that DIDN&#039;T have Summer Glau in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember that vicious flame war here last summer over Summer Glau&#8217;s appearance on Dollhouse, like it was going to be some humongous TV event that would reshape the course of the show?  Kinda seems silly in retrospect, huh?  The episode with Summer Glau in it dropped a share point from the Dollhouse episode that DIDN&#8217;T have Summer Glau in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170659</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 05:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170659</guid>
		<description>&quot;Joss should have proposed Faith The Vampire Slayer to Fox. That would have done well no matter what timeslot even on Friday Nights. Why? Because vampires = ratings.&quot;- I completely agree that would have done very well for Fox if written well, but I doubt Joss would ever consider it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Joss should have proposed Faith The Vampire Slayer to Fox. That would have done well no matter what timeslot even on Friday Nights. Why? Because vampires = ratings.&#8221;- I completely agree that would have done very well for Fox if written well, but I doubt Joss would ever consider it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170657</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 05:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170657</guid>
		<description>Dollhouse got less viewers than Grandma Got Run Over by a Reindeer????? wtf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dollhouse got less viewers than Grandma Got Run Over by a Reindeer????? wtf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chaos amoeba</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170652</link>
		<dc:creator>chaos amoeba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 04:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170652</guid>
		<description>Curiously, I think Jed wrote some of the strongest episodes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curiously, I think Jed wrote some of the strongest episodes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parenthood</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170649</link>
		<dc:creator>Parenthood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170649</guid>
		<description>Joss should have proposed Faith The Vampire Slayer to Fox. That would have done well no matter what timeslot even on Friday Nights. Why? Because vampires = ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joss should have proposed Faith The Vampire Slayer to Fox. That would have done well no matter what timeslot even on Friday Nights. Why? Because vampires = ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170645</link>
		<dc:creator>polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170645</guid>
		<description>Whedon fans are blind to quality. They have decided to like him and he could honestly film himself polishing a turd and they would call it the best piece of post modern television ever shown.

Oh wait... they already do... that turd is called Dullhouse. Maybe if Whedon hired better writers I would appreciate him more, but on this new series he just didn&#039;t. No Marti Noxons. No David Furys. No Drew Goddards. No one any good. Heck, he hired his own brother and I think one of the writers from that God awful Bionic Woman show!! What does that tell you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whedon fans are blind to quality. They have decided to like him and he could honestly film himself polishing a turd and they would call it the best piece of post modern television ever shown.</p>
<p>Oh wait&#8230; they already do&#8230; that turd is called Dullhouse. Maybe if Whedon hired better writers I would appreciate him more, but on this new series he just didn&#8217;t. No Marti Noxons. No David Furys. No Drew Goddards. No one any good. Heck, he hired his own brother and I think one of the writers from that God awful Bionic Woman show!! What does that tell you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170644</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170644</guid>
		<description>Pisher makes some excellent points and the Whedon &quot;fans&quot; just can&#039;t stand it. Mark, also, summed up everything I was going to say about it. If there are any doubts as to the quality of the writers working on Dullhouse just look at what they gave the series finale as a title: &quot;Epitaph Two: Return&quot; ?? What is this, a bad 80s horror movie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pisher makes some excellent points and the Whedon &#8220;fans&#8221; just can&#8217;t stand it. Mark, also, summed up everything I was going to say about it. If there are any doubts as to the quality of the writers working on Dullhouse just look at what they gave the series finale as a title: &#8220;Epitaph Two: Return&#8221; ?? What is this, a bad 80s horror movie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Holy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170638</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Holy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170638</guid>
		<description>As far as Dollhouse goes, it/they was/were pretty good episodes - for Dollhouse.

And Summer Glau played her character up just right - just like with River on Firelfy and just like with Cameron on TSCC. It&#039;s time for SOMEONE - PLEASE - to put her in a series that has some hope of surviving more than a season or two!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as Dollhouse goes, it/they was/were pretty good episodes &#8211; for Dollhouse.</p>
<p>And Summer Glau played her character up just right &#8211; just like with River on Firelfy and just like with Cameron on TSCC. It&#8217;s time for SOMEONE &#8211; PLEASE &#8211; to put her in a series that has some hope of surviving more than a season or two!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diego</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170634</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170634</guid>
		<description>I love Ugly Betty and maybe Shakira helped on yesterday&#039;s episode ratings, I love that they&#039;re moving UB to Wednesdays yay!, but it needs  a lot of promotion for its new time slot, well, I think they&#039;ll do that because it&#039;s gonna be part of the Comedy Wednesday and Modern Family and Cougar Town get a lot of promotion!! :) I don&#039;t go out on Fridays beacuse of UB- if they cancel it I&#039;m gonna be depressed for weeks :( and I just stopped watching Dollhouse because of Betty, and I don&#039;t have time to DVR it nor watch it online lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Ugly Betty and maybe Shakira helped on yesterday&#8217;s episode ratings, I love that they&#8217;re moving UB to Wednesdays yay!, but it needs  a lot of promotion for its new time slot, well, I think they&#8217;ll do that because it&#8217;s gonna be part of the Comedy Wednesday and Modern Family and Cougar Town get a lot of promotion!! <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I don&#8217;t go out on Fridays beacuse of UB- if they cancel it I&#8217;m gonna be depressed for weeks <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  and I just stopped watching Dollhouse because of Betty, and I don&#8217;t have time to DVR it nor watch it online lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heradite</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170633</link>
		<dc:creator>heradite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 01:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170633</guid>
		<description>Most people that hate Dollhouse now will love it like 5 years in the future.

Like Firefly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people that hate Dollhouse now will love it like 5 years in the future.</p>
<p>Like Firefly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kermonk</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170627</link>
		<dc:creator>Kermonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170627</guid>
		<description>@superglowy 

His manners are broken as well ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@superglowy </p>
<p>His manners are broken as well <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170625</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170625</guid>
		<description>Mark, I try to avoid the topic of pisher, because he enjoys it so much when people talk about him, but if you do enough searching on Google, you&#039;ll find pisher in almost any discussion that involves anything to do with Firefly. And he is always there for the express purpose to rile the fans up. I don&#039;t care for Firefly or Whedon or a lot of the other things that pisher rails against. But that doesn&#039;t blind me to the fact that he is nothing more than a troll.

Note that no one has called you a troll just for saying you don&#039;t like Dollhouse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I try to avoid the topic of pisher, because he enjoys it so much when people talk about him, but if you do enough searching on Google, you&#8217;ll find pisher in almost any discussion that involves anything to do with Firefly. And he is always there for the express purpose to rile the fans up. I don&#8217;t care for Firefly or Whedon or a lot of the other things that pisher rails against. But that doesn&#8217;t blind me to the fact that he is nothing more than a troll.</p>
<p>Note that no one has called you a troll just for saying you don&#8217;t like Dollhouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CK</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-6/#comment-170624</link>
		<dc:creator>CK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170624</guid>
		<description>UB is much better this season. Wednesday night after the other comedies is a better fit in so far as audience flow, but not sure this will bring in enough viewers to bring it back for another season.  Hopefully, ABC will give the producers enough notice so they can give the series a satisfying ending.  Maybe flashforward and have Betty be full on glam and become Editor in chief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UB is much better this season. Wednesday night after the other comedies is a better fit in so far as audience flow, but not sure this will bring in enough viewers to bring it back for another season.  Hopefully, ABC will give the producers enough notice so they can give the series a satisfying ending.  Maybe flashforward and have Betty be full on glam and become Editor in chief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-5/#comment-170621</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170621</guid>
		<description>I have been one of the rare few who have followed UGLY BETTY all over the place in its many day and time slots.  It&#039;s a shame it has so few viewers this year because I think the shows are some of the very best this season.  I am enjoying the new characters and the veterans as well.  I hope enough people will begin to watch to give it a chance to survive.  It really is well cast and the storylines are amazingly good this season.  And that&#039;s one viewer&#039;s opinion! Give it a try....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been one of the rare few who have followed UGLY BETTY all over the place in its many day and time slots.  It&#8217;s a shame it has so few viewers this year because I think the shows are some of the very best this season.  I am enjoying the new characters and the veterans as well.  I hope enough people will begin to watch to give it a chance to survive.  It really is well cast and the storylines are amazingly good this season.  And that&#8217;s one viewer&#8217;s opinion! Give it a try&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyberelf</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-5/#comment-170619</link>
		<dc:creator>cyberelf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170619</guid>
		<description>Just like the box office receipts of a movie don&#039;t indicate the quality of the movie; Quality of the tv show has NOTHING to do with the ratings. Great shows have been canceled - Pushing Daisies, Veronica Mars, Twin Peaks, Wonder Falls, Firefly, Profit, Arrested Development. All excellent shows not much with the ratings but now known for how good they were.
There are many other examples. Yet CSI: Topeka or whatever is a top 10 show. 

Shows like Cheers, Seinfeld and Friends would not have become the successes they eventually became based on their first season&#039;s ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like the box office receipts of a movie don&#8217;t indicate the quality of the movie; Quality of the tv show has NOTHING to do with the ratings. Great shows have been canceled &#8211; Pushing Daisies, Veronica Mars, Twin Peaks, Wonder Falls, Firefly, Profit, Arrested Development. All excellent shows not much with the ratings but now known for how good they were.<br />
There are many other examples. Yet CSI: Topeka or whatever is a top 10 show. </p>
<p>Shows like Cheers, Seinfeld and Friends would not have become the successes they eventually became based on their first season&#8217;s ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-5/#comment-170616</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170616</guid>
		<description>&quot;Also, pisher is a troll who loves nothing more than to rile up Whedon fans. Any time you reply to him you’re making his day.&quot;

Although I think pisher probably does enjoy riling up Whedon fans, I take issue with the idea that he&#039;s a troll. Whedon fans think Whedon is a genius and Dollhouse is cutting edge, smart, risky drama, while pisher thinks Whedon is overrated and Dollhouse is dreck. That doesn&#039;t make him a troll, it just means he disagrees with the pro-Whedon camp. He would only be a troll if this was a Joss Whedon message board, but it isn&#039;t. There is no &quot;right&quot; or &quot;wrong&quot; side in this debate. Disagree with him all you want but put your money where your mouth is and argue his point instead of calling him names. Playing the &quot;troll&quot; card because you can&#039;t marshal a compelling counter-argument is just being lazy. I don&#039;t like Dollhouse one bit and I also think Whedon is overrated, and I&#039;m definitely not a troll. 

I&#039;ve posted at length (too often, I know) about what I perceive Dollhouse&#039;s failings to be, because I think Whedon&#039;s early work on Buffy showed a lot of promise and I&#039;m boggled by the fact that Dollhouse is such a complete and utter misfire. I also think Whedon&#039;s been coasting on his Buffy laurels for years while his actors and his co-writers don&#039;t get anywhere near the amount of credit they should have for that show&#039;s success. Without Alyson Hannigan, I&#039;m pretty sure Buffy wouldn&#039;t have been anywhere near the success it was. Without Sarah Michelle Gellar to anchor the show I doubt the audience would have kept tuning in. But all we ever hear about is Whedon, and how he&#039;s an inspired genius, and how all of his failings are the network&#039;s fault for interfering with his vision or the director&#039;s fault for mangling his movie scripts. Now we have Whedon&#039;s Dollhouse, which he must take complete respnsibility for, which is not only a misfire but an infuriating one on various levels that practically begs for insightful critique. Okay, I&#039;m rambling. But if Whedon fans on this board want to leap to his defense, do it--not by calling non-fans like pisher names, not by pouting that people who never watched the show are just dummies who watch nothing but reality shows and CSI but by actually arguing insightfully. This isn&#039;t Whedonesque and it isn&#039;t taken for granted here that Joss Whedon is our master.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Also, pisher is a troll who loves nothing more than to rile up Whedon fans. Any time you reply to him you’re making his day.&#8221;</p>
<p>Although I think pisher probably does enjoy riling up Whedon fans, I take issue with the idea that he&#8217;s a troll. Whedon fans think Whedon is a genius and Dollhouse is cutting edge, smart, risky drama, while pisher thinks Whedon is overrated and Dollhouse is dreck. That doesn&#8217;t make him a troll, it just means he disagrees with the pro-Whedon camp. He would only be a troll if this was a Joss Whedon message board, but it isn&#8217;t. There is no &#8220;right&#8221; or &#8220;wrong&#8221; side in this debate. Disagree with him all you want but put your money where your mouth is and argue his point instead of calling him names. Playing the &#8220;troll&#8221; card because you can&#8217;t marshal a compelling counter-argument is just being lazy. I don&#8217;t like Dollhouse one bit and I also think Whedon is overrated, and I&#8217;m definitely not a troll. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve posted at length (too often, I know) about what I perceive Dollhouse&#8217;s failings to be, because I think Whedon&#8217;s early work on Buffy showed a lot of promise and I&#8217;m boggled by the fact that Dollhouse is such a complete and utter misfire. I also think Whedon&#8217;s been coasting on his Buffy laurels for years while his actors and his co-writers don&#8217;t get anywhere near the amount of credit they should have for that show&#8217;s success. Without Alyson Hannigan, I&#8217;m pretty sure Buffy wouldn&#8217;t have been anywhere near the success it was. Without Sarah Michelle Gellar to anchor the show I doubt the audience would have kept tuning in. But all we ever hear about is Whedon, and how he&#8217;s an inspired genius, and how all of his failings are the network&#8217;s fault for interfering with his vision or the director&#8217;s fault for mangling his movie scripts. Now we have Whedon&#8217;s Dollhouse, which he must take complete respnsibility for, which is not only a misfire but an infuriating one on various levels that practically begs for insightful critique. Okay, I&#8217;m rambling. But if Whedon fans on this board want to leap to his defense, do it&#8211;not by calling non-fans like pisher names, not by pouting that people who never watched the show are just dummies who watch nothing but reality shows and CSI but by actually arguing insightfully. This isn&#8217;t Whedonesque and it isn&#8217;t taken for granted here that Joss Whedon is our master.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-5/#comment-170612</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170612</guid>
		<description>&quot;bummed that people are not watching dollhouse.. I don’t really get it. It is unique. We have more than enough cop shows/crime dramas… csi etc.&quot;

I think this needs to be said: television drama is not a choice between Dollhouse and various crime procedurals. It isn&#039;t an either/or situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;bummed that people are not watching dollhouse.. I don’t really get it. It is unique. We have more than enough cop shows/crime dramas… csi etc.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think this needs to be said: television drama is not a choice between Dollhouse and various crime procedurals. It isn&#8217;t an either/or situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-5/#comment-170608</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170608</guid>
		<description>From Joss&#039; Biggest Fan: &quot;(2) According to my mathematical abilities, if you add the ratings for both episodes, Dollhouse actually had about 4 million viewers and a 1.6 in the demo! Yay!! That’s almost as good as Ghost Whisperer and Medium in the demo!&quot;

Please tell me you&#039;re joking, because if you aren&#039;t your mathematical abilities clearly never made it past grade school. With that logic, we would have to say that every other show on TV last night aired two episodes as well. Ghost Whisperer and Medium double to a 3.8 and a 3.6 and Dollhouse still loses just as badly.

Quality of the show aside, no one&#039;s watching. And that&#039;s why it was cancelled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Joss&#8217; Biggest Fan: &#8220;(2) According to my mathematical abilities, if you add the ratings for both episodes, Dollhouse actually had about 4 million viewers and a 1.6 in the demo! Yay!! That’s almost as good as Ghost Whisperer and Medium in the demo!&#8221;</p>
<p>Please tell me you&#8217;re joking, because if you aren&#8217;t your mathematical abilities clearly never made it past grade school. With that logic, we would have to say that every other show on TV last night aired two episodes as well. Ghost Whisperer and Medium double to a 3.8 and a 3.6 and Dollhouse still loses just as badly.</p>
<p>Quality of the show aside, no one&#8217;s watching. And that&#8217;s why it was cancelled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-5/#comment-170606</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170606</guid>
		<description>The last DOLLHOUSE episodes SHOULD be good. No more need to compromise on quality chasing ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last DOLLHOUSE episodes SHOULD be good. No more need to compromise on quality chasing ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-5/#comment-170597</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170597</guid>
		<description>Friday night on network is so dead.

I know you guys love your shows but its hard to defend any show that lost to The Muppets.  The freakin&#039; Muppets!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friday night on network is so dead.</p>
<p>I know you guys love your shows but its hard to defend any show that lost to The Muppets.  The freakin&#8217; Muppets!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usedtolovecoco</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-5/#comment-170596</link>
		<dc:creator>usedtolovecoco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170596</guid>
		<description>&gt;&quot;bummed that people are not watching dollhouse.. I don’t really get it. It is unique. &quot;

The last 3 episodes might have been good, but overall it&#039;s been pretty bad, especially season 1. If it had started out this good it might have retained some more viewers, but, it didn&#039;t.

I have a feeling the rest of the season will be entertaining and I&#039;m looking forward to it; Whedon works well under pressure, and always does better work when building towards something. So really, the cancellation has made it a better show. A lot of people are going to use the quality of these eps as a reason it shouldn&#039;t be canceled, but, they&#039;re missing the chicken and the egg. 

Also, pisher is a troll who loves nothing more than to rile up Whedon fans. Any time you reply to him you&#039;re making his day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&#8221;bummed that people are not watching dollhouse.. I don’t really get it. It is unique. &#8221;</p>
<p>The last 3 episodes might have been good, but overall it&#8217;s been pretty bad, especially season 1. If it had started out this good it might have retained some more viewers, but, it didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I have a feeling the rest of the season will be entertaining and I&#8217;m looking forward to it; Whedon works well under pressure, and always does better work when building towards something. So really, the cancellation has made it a better show. A lot of people are going to use the quality of these eps as a reason it shouldn&#8217;t be canceled, but, they&#8217;re missing the chicken and the egg. </p>
<p>Also, pisher is a troll who loves nothing more than to rile up Whedon fans. Any time you reply to him you&#8217;re making his day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Statlc</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-5/#comment-170595</link>
		<dc:creator>Statlc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170595</guid>
		<description>Syfy would be killing for those 2 million viewers Dollhouse are getting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Syfy would be killing for those 2 million viewers Dollhouse are getting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-5/#comment-170594</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170594</guid>
		<description>Good that Betty bounced back. I figured it will. Im guessing when Betty moves to Wednesdays, it will get 1.7-1.8 like Bill said and maybe 5.5 million viewers. 

Basically, Ugly Betty will get the same demo as Eastwick but more viewers. Eastwicks demo after a new Cougar Town is about 1.7-1.8. Now that its been airing after a repeat, its been worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good that Betty bounced back. I figured it will. Im guessing when Betty moves to Wednesdays, it will get 1.7-1.8 like Bill said and maybe 5.5 million viewers. </p>
<p>Basically, Ugly Betty will get the same demo as Eastwick but more viewers. Eastwicks demo after a new Cougar Town is about 1.7-1.8. Now that its been airing after a repeat, its been worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shinyhappy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-5/#comment-170592</link>
		<dc:creator>shinyhappy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170592</guid>
		<description>bummed that people are not watching dollhouse.. I don&#039;t really get it. It is unique. We have more than enough cop shows/crime dramas... csi etc. I know people like them... but really how many do they have to watch.. i am so bored with television this fall.. nothing good is on and I am a big tv fan. I know dollhouse is canceled though.. its a shame.. hey maybe they will put on another ncis or csi..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bummed that people are not watching dollhouse.. I don&#8217;t really get it. It is unique. We have more than enough cop shows/crime dramas&#8230; csi etc. I know people like them&#8230; but really how many do they have to watch.. i am so bored with television this fall.. nothing good is on and I am a big tv fan. I know dollhouse is canceled though.. its a shame.. hey maybe they will put on another ncis or csi..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdot</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-5/#comment-170586</link>
		<dc:creator>tdot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170586</guid>
		<description>Dreams come true was essentially an hour long commercial for Disney&#039;s The Princess and the Frog and it even beat Dollhouse...and it looks like Betty&#039;s kickin&#039;, but just barely</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dreams come true was essentially an hour long commercial for Disney&#8217;s The Princess and the Frog and it even beat Dollhouse&#8230;and it looks like Betty&#8217;s kickin&#8217;, but just barely</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMP</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356/comment-page-5/#comment-170583</link>
		<dc:creator>DMP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/12/05/tv-ratings-dollhousereturns-quietly-ugly-betty-bounces-back-33/35356#comment-170583</guid>
		<description>&quot;pisher&quot; you might want to actually add a little knowledge to your ramblings: Joss has several projects on the board and  - so before, as you YOU claim, he is finished as a serious creative force in television, let&#039;s leave it up to the folks who actually work in that medium to decide his fate... God knows they certainly know a whole lot more about Joss&#039;s attributes and what he may or may not be able to offer than you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;pisher&#8221; you might want to actually add a little knowledge to your ramblings: Joss has several projects on the board and  &#8211; so before, as you YOU claim, he is finished as a serious creative force in television, let&#8217;s leave it up to the folks who actually work in that medium to decide his fate&#8230; God knows they certainly know a whole lot more about Joss&#8217;s attributes and what he may or may not be able to offer than you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

