<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updated: Chuck Season 3 Premieres Strong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:09:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGgwab</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-7/#comment-191156</link>
		<dc:creator>McGgwab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 04:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-191156</guid>
		<description>It would actually be baffling how this show doesn&#039;t regularly do better if I never looked at what mentally-deficient drivel is popular. Seeing as most of the shows that are &quot;up there&quot; in popularity are melodramatic, cliched pieces of trash, acted by insipid fools, and written by even bigger fools, one can really only come to the conclusion that 90% of the viewing audience out there couldn&#039;t or wouldn&#039;t accept something smartly written and that is actually somewhat goofily refreshing (and only slightly implausible =P ).

Negative commentary about the terrible state of television aside, I&#039;m really glad Chuck is back! I&#039;m also glad that they didn&#039;t tamper with the formula that makes Chuck a great series too much, even though we&#039;re only 3 episodes in so far. I was relieved to see that they weren&#039;t relying too heavily on the Intersect 2.0 gimmick to push the plot along/vanquish the bad guys. I am really looking forward to see how this season is going to progress, and hopefully they&#039;ll keep the revolving mini-plots that they&#039;ve done so well with up to this point, going (according to interviews I&#039;ve read on TVguide.com, it seems this will be the case, and I think this is one of the show&#039;s greatest strengths).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would actually be baffling how this show doesn&#8217;t regularly do better if I never looked at what mentally-deficient drivel is popular. Seeing as most of the shows that are &#8220;up there&#8221; in popularity are melodramatic, cliched pieces of trash, acted by insipid fools, and written by even bigger fools, one can really only come to the conclusion that 90% of the viewing audience out there couldn&#8217;t or wouldn&#8217;t accept something smartly written and that is actually somewhat goofily refreshing (and only slightly implausible =P ).</p>
<p>Negative commentary about the terrible state of television aside, I&#8217;m really glad Chuck is back! I&#8217;m also glad that they didn&#8217;t tamper with the formula that makes Chuck a great series too much, even though we&#8217;re only 3 episodes in so far. I was relieved to see that they weren&#8217;t relying too heavily on the Intersect 2.0 gimmick to push the plot along/vanquish the bad guys. I am really looking forward to see how this season is going to progress, and hopefully they&#8217;ll keep the revolving mini-plots that they&#8217;ve done so well with up to this point, going (according to interviews I&#8217;ve read on TVguide.com, it seems this will be the case, and I think this is one of the show&#8217;s greatest strengths).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Which Shows Will Get Cancelled? (Part 1) &#187; Axiom&#39;s Edge Science Fiction and Fantasy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-7/#comment-188024</link>
		<dc:creator>Which Shows Will Get Cancelled? (Part 1) &#187; Axiom&#39;s Edge Science Fiction and Fantasy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-188024</guid>
		<description>[...] Already Airing) – The little-show-that-could has several things going for it including the strong start it got off to this week. The two hour premiere average a 2.9 rating and close to 8 million viewers, both very good for this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Already Airing) – The little-show-that-could has several things going for it including the strong start it got off to this week. The two hour premiere average a 2.9 rating and close to 8 million viewers, both very good for this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Update: Spider-Man 4 Gets Shelved with Reboot Planned &#187; Axiom&#39;s Edge Science Fiction and Fantasy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-7/#comment-188020</link>
		<dc:creator>Update: Spider-Man 4 Gets Shelved with Reboot Planned &#187; Axiom&#39;s Edge Science Fiction and Fantasy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-188020</guid>
		<description>[...] Chuck Season 3 Premieres Strong TV by the Numbers 1/11/2010 The first hour of the season 3 premiere of Chuck averaged  3.0 rating with adults 18-49 and 7.7  million viewers and the second hour averaged 2.9 rating with adults 18-49 and 7.2 million. (Read the Full Article) // [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chuck Season 3 Premieres Strong TV by the Numbers 1/11/2010 The first hour of the season 3 premiere of Chuck averaged  3.0 rating with adults 18-49 and 7.7  million viewers and the second hour averaged 2.9 rating with adults 18-49 and 7.2 million. (Read the Full Article) // [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoniqueE!</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-7/#comment-187983</link>
		<dc:creator>MoniqueE!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-187983</guid>
		<description>AWESOM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWESOM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul 80</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-7/#comment-187306</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul 80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-187306</guid>
		<description>NBC has a secert weapon and its not CHUCK. His name is Jeff Gaspin. Finally the suits have hired a person with a programming proven record (USA NETWORK). It may take Mr. Gaspin 3 or 4 years to turn this giant corp. around, but if anyone can Jeff Gaspin is the one.

On the unfavorable comments on (Chuck) Sundays 1st show I whole understand. The writers had very diffuclt hurdle. They needed to cram 2 hours of story telling into a 1 hour show to acommodate both new and old viewers.

I heard a FEW interesting developments for CHUCK. Hopefully everyone will know in the next month.

Robert and Bill the awesome contest is, well awesome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC has a secert weapon and its not CHUCK. His name is Jeff Gaspin. Finally the suits have hired a person with a programming proven record (USA NETWORK). It may take Mr. Gaspin 3 or 4 years to turn this giant corp. around, but if anyone can Jeff Gaspin is the one.</p>
<p>On the unfavorable comments on (Chuck) Sundays 1st show I whole understand. The writers had very diffuclt hurdle. They needed to cram 2 hours of story telling into a 1 hour show to acommodate both new and old viewers.</p>
<p>I heard a FEW interesting developments for CHUCK. Hopefully everyone will know in the next month.</p>
<p>Robert and Bill the awesome contest is, well awesome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kell</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-7/#comment-186815</link>
		<dc:creator>Kell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186815</guid>
		<description>PS ............ I do love the show. Just tired of all the on sided &quot;Stuff&quot; ( dont respond to me I am gone. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; I do love the show. Just tired of all the on sided &#8220;Stuff&#8221; ( dont respond to me I am gone. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kell</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-7/#comment-186814</link>
		<dc:creator>Kell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186814</guid>
		<description>Strong  #&#039;s 
OMFG ! ............... Outta here people. you are a joke !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strong  #&#8217;s<br />
OMFG ! &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; Outta here people. you are a joke !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenna</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-7/#comment-186804</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186804</guid>
		<description>Chuck was definitely AWESOME tonight.  It was great to see Devon AKA Captain Awesome in on some of the action.  It was just great to see more of him and Ellie in general.  One of my fave episodes EVER!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck was definitely AWESOME tonight.  It was great to see Devon AKA Captain Awesome in on some of the action.  It was just great to see more of him and Ellie in general.  One of my fave episodes EVER!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KN</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-7/#comment-186800</link>
		<dc:creator>KN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186800</guid>
		<description>George: Chuck flashed on the newscast, before dancing, on the assassin and before doctoring Casey.

I&#039;m glad the show did well. I wish it could be the hit it deserves to be. Though, there is something appealing about it being the underdog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George: Chuck flashed on the newscast, before dancing, on the assassin and before doctoring Casey.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad the show did well. I wish it could be the hit it deserves to be. Though, there is something appealing about it being the underdog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-7/#comment-186787</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186787</guid>
		<description>Chuck has an iPhone app...  Longevity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck has an iPhone app&#8230;  Longevity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIke the Canadian</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186777</link>
		<dc:creator>MIke the Canadian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 05:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186777</guid>
		<description>I personally like #2 and #3 better than the first, tonight&#039;s was quite entertaining Armand Assante was hilarious and Casey. Yes George chuck flashed during the embassy dance with Sara. I actually found the pace to be quick, allot of cut scenes no preamble no chit chat just whats the mission, who&#039;s the bad guy, oh the ring, whats next, beckman, back to bad guys, bit more time with Devon and Ellie in this one to feed the story and connect to next weeks arc. All in all great to have Chuck back saving the world and lusting for Sarah.
On the numbers well Chuck has its fan base and I think that will stay the same I don&#039;t think there will be much deviation throughout the season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally like #2 and #3 better than the first, tonight&#8217;s was quite entertaining Armand Assante was hilarious and Casey. Yes George chuck flashed during the embassy dance with Sara. I actually found the pace to be quick, allot of cut scenes no preamble no chit chat just whats the mission, who&#8217;s the bad guy, oh the ring, whats next, beckman, back to bad guys, bit more time with Devon and Ellie in this one to feed the story and connect to next weeks arc. All in all great to have Chuck back saving the world and lusting for Sarah.<br />
On the numbers well Chuck has its fan base and I think that will stay the same I don&#8217;t think there will be much deviation throughout the season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martitha</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186751</link>
		<dc:creator>Martitha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 04:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186751</guid>
		<description>Well done, Chuck!!!!
Mexican fans are with you!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done, Chuck!!!!<br />
Mexican fans are with you!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AgentChuck003</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186741</link>
		<dc:creator>AgentChuck003</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 03:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186741</guid>
		<description>Chuck was Awesome. Hell yeah. 

Everything clicked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck was Awesome. Hell yeah. </p>
<p>Everything clicked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186725</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 03:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186725</guid>
		<description>Chuck was awesome tonight</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck was awesome tonight</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186669</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186669</guid>
		<description>Comedy Central is owned by Viacom. There is no corporate connection with NBC.

In a partial non-sequiter, I did see ads for the Super Bowl half time on the NBC Wild Card games this weekend. They focused on the halftime sponsor (Barclays?) but featured CBS Sports more prominently than any other ad I recall seeing on a rival broadcast network in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comedy Central is owned by Viacom. There is no corporate connection with NBC.</p>
<p>In a partial non-sequiter, I did see ads for the Super Bowl half time on the NBC Wild Card games this weekend. They focused on the halftime sponsor (Barclays?) but featured CBS Sports more prominently than any other ad I recall seeing on a rival broadcast network in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YuBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Discuss: “Chuck” Episode 3.03 “Chuck Vs. the Angel de la Muerte”</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186668</link>
		<dc:creator>YuBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Discuss: “Chuck” Episode 3.03 “Chuck Vs. the Angel de la Muerte”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186668</guid>
		<description>[...] Angel de la Muerte&#8221;.  Do you think the season can please everyone?  Ratings from last night were strong.  Leave any comments about this episode down [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Angel de la Muerte&#8221;.  Do you think the season can please everyone?  Ratings from last night were strong.  Leave any comments about this episode down [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186666</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186666</guid>
		<description>@Rick:

Are you aware of the state NBC is currently in? Expecting a 5.0 is absurd. Yes, NBC advertised the hell out of the show and that&#039;s probably a big reason for the spike in viewers. But you do realize that in order for promotion to be a huge help, people have to be watching the network on which a show is being promoted, right? 

A scant few people watch NBC religiously anymore, which means not as many people saw the Chuck ads as they would&#039;ve if it had been equally advertised on CBS. So, all things considered, a 3.0 is great for the Chuck premiere. With the sad state NBC is in, that qualifies as a hit. If it can hold anything above a 2.5 throughout the season, I would think it&#039;s a lock to get a fourth season. Something that I would have thought was ridiculous at this point last year.

On a side note, are NBC and Comedy Central affiliated in any way? I saw Chuck ads on Comedy Central, and did a double take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rick:</p>
<p>Are you aware of the state NBC is currently in? Expecting a 5.0 is absurd. Yes, NBC advertised the hell out of the show and that&#8217;s probably a big reason for the spike in viewers. But you do realize that in order for promotion to be a huge help, people have to be watching the network on which a show is being promoted, right? </p>
<p>A scant few people watch NBC religiously anymore, which means not as many people saw the Chuck ads as they would&#8217;ve if it had been equally advertised on CBS. So, all things considered, a 3.0 is great for the Chuck premiere. With the sad state NBC is in, that qualifies as a hit. If it can hold anything above a 2.5 throughout the season, I would think it&#8217;s a lock to get a fourth season. Something that I would have thought was ridiculous at this point last year.</p>
<p>On a side note, are NBC and Comedy Central affiliated in any way? I saw Chuck ads on Comedy Central, and did a double take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jwords</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186665</link>
		<dc:creator>Jwords</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186665</guid>
		<description>Wish the network had released S2 DVD in time for me to watch it before S3 started.

Give the customers what they want, when the want it, TV execs. The world&#039;s changing, have you noticed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish the network had released S2 DVD in time for me to watch it before S3 started.</p>
<p>Give the customers what they want, when the want it, TV execs. The world&#8217;s changing, have you noticed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Langston</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186645</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Langston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186645</guid>
		<description>I am a huge fan of &quot;Chuck&quot;, but I have to say that I was pretty disappointed with the premiere episodes.

Rather than being FUN, the show was sexist, graphically violent, cold, and crude. 

If it looses audiences, it will be because of those things... and not the time slot or competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a huge fan of &#8220;Chuck&#8221;, but I have to say that I was pretty disappointed with the premiere episodes.</p>
<p>Rather than being FUN, the show was sexist, graphically violent, cold, and crude. </p>
<p>If it looses audiences, it will be because of those things&#8230; and not the time slot or competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diversteve123</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186633</link>
		<dc:creator>Diversteve123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186633</guid>
		<description>I thought the episodes last night were GREAT! I&#039;m glad the numbers are good and hopefully stay strong throughout the season!  I am making sure all of my friends watch it! Season 4 please!!!!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the episodes last night were GREAT! I&#8217;m glad the numbers are good and hopefully stay strong throughout the season!  I am making sure all of my friends watch it! Season 4 please!!!!! <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186626</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186626</guid>
		<description>2.5 A18-34 rating in the first half hour, 2.6 in the last 3 half hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2.5 A18-34 rating in the first half hour, 2.6 in the last 3 half hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VYuci</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186622</link>
		<dc:creator>VYuci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186622</guid>
		<description>Robert or Bill, what did Chuck get in the 18-34 demo? Just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert or Bill, what did Chuck get in the 18-34 demo? Just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luvmygreys</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186619</link>
		<dc:creator>luvmygreys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186619</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed the shows but must say I was disappointed by the first one.  The second one was much better.  I am looking forward to tonight.  I was also disappointed by the way they handled the Chuck/Sarah romance.  I don&#039;t see why they can&#039;t go the route that Bryce and Sarah and work together and be involved.  Also any chance Bryce will be back.  His body was dragged out, are they planning a resurrection?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed the shows but must say I was disappointed by the first one.  The second one was much better.  I am looking forward to tonight.  I was also disappointed by the way they handled the Chuck/Sarah romance.  I don&#8217;t see why they can&#8217;t go the route that Bryce and Sarah and work together and be involved.  Also any chance Bryce will be back.  His body was dragged out, are they planning a resurrection?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kmackowe</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186617</link>
		<dc:creator>kmackowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186617</guid>
		<description>I absolutely enjoyed Sunday&#039;s episodes and I&#039;m totally psyched about what&#039;s running tonight. Knowing Chuck, they&#039;ll do just as well, if not better, than they always have against the big guns on Monday. It&#039;s a spectacular show. So long as NBC continues to renew it, I&#039;ll be happy.

Viva la Chuck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely enjoyed Sunday&#8217;s episodes and I&#8217;m totally psyched about what&#8217;s running tonight. Knowing Chuck, they&#8217;ll do just as well, if not better, than they always have against the big guns on Monday. It&#8217;s a spectacular show. So long as NBC continues to renew it, I&#8217;ll be happy.</p>
<p>Viva la Chuck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186605</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186605</guid>
		<description>AWESOMEE (:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWESOMEE (:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenna</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186585</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186585</guid>
		<description>YAAAAY!  I hope they can hold some decent #&#039;s tonight.  Go Chuck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YAAAAY!  I hope they can hold some decent #&#8217;s tonight.  Go Chuck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oneeye</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186581</link>
		<dc:creator>oneeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186581</guid>
		<description>Finally some good news</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally some good news</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ST</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186575</link>
		<dc:creator>ST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186575</guid>
		<description>Yeah, well, anyone who watched ep 2 should know exactly why it led in the male demographic. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, well, anyone who watched ep 2 should know exactly why it led in the male demographic. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MelangellAK</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186568</link>
		<dc:creator>MelangellAK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186568</guid>
		<description>YEAH CHUCK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YEAH CHUCK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186560</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186560</guid>
		<description>Great job Chuck!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job Chuck!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186553</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186553</guid>
		<description>To Schmoker: The 3.0 rating was for a specific age bracket. Chuck&#039;s overall rating was a 7.7 for the first show &amp; a 7.2 for the second hour. The last episode to draw better than a 7.7, excluding the 3-D episode (which pulled in a 8.35 million viewers) was Season 1 episode 11, &quot;Chuck vs. the Crown Vic&quot; which aired March 12, 2007! This is HUGE news! The only other episode that came close to last night&#039;s 7.7 rating was Season 2 episode 11, &quot;Chuck vs. Santa Claus&quot; which drew a 7.6 rating. Season 2 episode 9, &quot;Chuck vs. The Sensei&quot; a drew 7.25 rating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Schmoker: The 3.0 rating was for a specific age bracket. Chuck&#8217;s overall rating was a 7.7 for the first show &amp; a 7.2 for the second hour. The last episode to draw better than a 7.7, excluding the 3-D episode (which pulled in a 8.35 million viewers) was Season 1 episode 11, &#8220;Chuck vs. the Crown Vic&#8221; which aired March 12, 2007! This is HUGE news! The only other episode that came close to last night&#8217;s 7.7 rating was Season 2 episode 11, &#8220;Chuck vs. Santa Claus&#8221; which drew a 7.6 rating. Season 2 episode 9, &#8220;Chuck vs. The Sensei&#8221; a drew 7.25 rating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186549</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186549</guid>
		<description>rick, a 5.0 rating on NBC for a scripted show is fantasy. The Office had a 4.8 rating for the week of 10/11/09, that&#039;s the network best since the week of 9/27/09.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rick, a 5.0 rating on NBC for a scripted show is fantasy. The Office had a 4.8 rating for the week of 10/11/09, that&#8217;s the network best since the week of 9/27/09.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-6/#comment-186548</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186548</guid>
		<description>I LOVE chuck, but I have to say that even a fantastic 3.0 rating is pretty lame compared to how much nbc has invested in promoting the show, i mean 8 previews, a average of 7 minutes of commercials related to chuck daily since december, any other show would have EASILY scored at least a 5.0 rating with all that promotion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE chuck, but I have to say that even a fantastic 3.0 rating is pretty lame compared to how much nbc has invested in promoting the show, i mean 8 previews, a average of 7 minutes of commercials related to chuck daily since december, any other show would have EASILY scored at least a 5.0 rating with all that promotion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: f1poin0</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-5/#comment-186545</link>
		<dc:creator>f1poin0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186545</guid>
		<description>Re: Carlosz...

The first episode was not as strong because it was a severe departure from the typical Chuck episode.  I think the reason that happened was because the show&#039;s creators, writers, etc. didn&#039;t think Chuck had much of a chance of coming back for another season so most of the tension in the plot lines were resolved.  The first episode last night served to undo what happened during last year&#039;s finale.  It was somewhat messy, and awkward because they had to pull 180&#039;s and do so much to bring plot lines back to life - e.g. the romantic tension between Sarah and Chuck.  The second episode was awesome and more true to form in what you will see from Chuck from week to week.  Stick around and I don&#039;t think you will be dissappointed.  BTW, Yvonne Strahovski was hotter than ever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Carlosz&#8230;</p>
<p>The first episode was not as strong because it was a severe departure from the typical Chuck episode.  I think the reason that happened was because the show&#8217;s creators, writers, etc. didn&#8217;t think Chuck had much of a chance of coming back for another season so most of the tension in the plot lines were resolved.  The first episode last night served to undo what happened during last year&#8217;s finale.  It was somewhat messy, and awkward because they had to pull 180&#8242;s and do so much to bring plot lines back to life &#8211; e.g. the romantic tension between Sarah and Chuck.  The second episode was awesome and more true to form in what you will see from Chuck from week to week.  Stick around and I don&#8217;t think you will be dissappointed.  BTW, Yvonne Strahovski was hotter than ever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MC</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-5/#comment-186527</link>
		<dc:creator>MC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186527</guid>
		<description>Last night Chuck had to deal with the Simpsons extravaganza AND a new ep of DH. I don&#039;t think the House/HIMYM/Bachelor combo will be much more formidable than that..at least that&#039;s what I&#039;m hoping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night Chuck had to deal with the Simpsons extravaganza AND a new ep of DH. I don&#8217;t think the House/HIMYM/Bachelor combo will be much more formidable than that..at least that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m hoping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-5/#comment-186524</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186524</guid>
		<description>Robert, if the numbers dip significantly tonight (back to around 2.2-2.4) do you think NBC could consider the possibility of permanently moving Chuck to Sunday? One of the big complaints about the ratings has been that a show on a floundering network can&#039;t be expected to keep up with such stiff Monday competition, and these ratings seem to support that point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, if the numbers dip significantly tonight (back to around 2.2-2.4) do you think NBC could consider the possibility of permanently moving Chuck to Sunday? One of the big complaints about the ratings has been that a show on a floundering network can&#8217;t be expected to keep up with such stiff Monday competition, and these ratings seem to support that point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brynna</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-5/#comment-186515</link>
		<dc:creator>Brynna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186515</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;d like Chuck to stay on Sundays. I&#039;m scared to death of what House and HIMYM are going to do to it tonight!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;d like Chuck to stay on Sundays. I&#8217;m scared to death of what House and HIMYM are going to do to it tonight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-5/#comment-186501</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186501</guid>
		<description>Forget the prediction.....&quot;NBC Suckage tax&quot; is coined phrase of the year for me.  Still makes me laugh just saying it.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget the prediction&#8230;..&#8221;NBC Suckage tax&#8221; is coined phrase of the year for me.  Still makes me laugh just saying it.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-5/#comment-186497</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186497</guid>
		<description>Gambs, if I told you my original prediction was 2.9 nobody would believe me.  But it was much safer to go low and bank on the &quot;Seidman Underestimates (ANOTHER) Premiere&#039;s Ratings&quot; curse. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gambs, if I told you my original prediction was 2.9 nobody would believe me.  But it was much safer to go low and bank on the &#8220;Seidman Underestimates (ANOTHER) Premiere&#8217;s Ratings&#8221; curse. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gambs</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-5/#comment-186490</link>
		<dc:creator>Gambs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186490</guid>
		<description>So, based on the ratings, Robert, it exceeded your prediction, even with the NBC Suckage tax.

Here was your prediction:
When we last saw Chuck it was pulling a 2.4 rating with adults 18-49  and 6.12 million viewers in the 8pm hour on a Monday in the overnight Live+SD numbers.   I’d love to predict a 2.6 and 7 million viewers, but because it’s NBC, I can’t.

In fact, what I want to do is apply a straight 20 percent NBC suckage tax for being on NBC.  NBC isn’t down by that much versus last season, but increases to Sunday Night Football have helped the overall averages some.  The ratings carnage particularly for scripted  one hour dramas is worse, and this will be the first Sunday in a long while where NBC has had any scripted content.

The 20% suckage tax yields a 1.9 adults 18-49 rating.  Because it’s Chuck (and not, for instance Trauma, or Mercy) I’ll assess only  a 15% NBC suckage tax.

That yields a 2.0 rating with adults 18-49 and 5.2 million.



2.9/7.2 certainly exceeds your expectations.  Now, it&#039;s up against tougher competition tonight in House, HIMYM and The Bachelor, but I still think it will bring a 2.5/7.0 tonight.  That would exceed whatever terrible numbers Heroes was drawing in the same slot in the fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, based on the ratings, Robert, it exceeded your prediction, even with the NBC Suckage tax.</p>
<p>Here was your prediction:<br />
When we last saw Chuck it was pulling a 2.4 rating with adults 18-49  and 6.12 million viewers in the 8pm hour on a Monday in the overnight Live+SD numbers.   I’d love to predict a 2.6 and 7 million viewers, but because it’s NBC, I can’t.</p>
<p>In fact, what I want to do is apply a straight 20 percent NBC suckage tax for being on NBC.  NBC isn’t down by that much versus last season, but increases to Sunday Night Football have helped the overall averages some.  The ratings carnage particularly for scripted  one hour dramas is worse, and this will be the first Sunday in a long while where NBC has had any scripted content.</p>
<p>The 20% suckage tax yields a 1.9 adults 18-49 rating.  Because it’s Chuck (and not, for instance Trauma, or Mercy) I’ll assess only  a 15% NBC suckage tax.</p>
<p>That yields a 2.0 rating with adults 18-49 and 5.2 million.</p>
<p>2.9/7.2 certainly exceeds your expectations.  Now, it&#8217;s up against tougher competition tonight in House, HIMYM and The Bachelor, but I still think it will bring a 2.5/7.0 tonight.  That would exceed whatever terrible numbers Heroes was drawing in the same slot in the fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChuckFan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-5/#comment-186478</link>
		<dc:creator>ChuckFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186478</guid>
		<description>I am glad!I thought the premiere was great, and the new story additions were great. Now that I can drool over Yvonne Strahovski once again, there is balance in the universe and the planets are now aligned!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad!I thought the premiere was great, and the new story additions were great. Now that I can drool over Yvonne Strahovski once again, there is balance in the universe and the planets are now aligned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: witheringrose</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-5/#comment-186476</link>
		<dc:creator>witheringrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186476</guid>
		<description>&quot;In those free hours that NBC got now moving leno, they should put at least some re-runs for the new viewers to at least understand better whats going on.&quot;

That will NEVER happen. Reruns of Chuck does considerably worst than reruns of any of the L&amp;O franchises as demonstrated 2 summers ago when NBC aired reruns of Chuck on Saturdays.

Just cross your fingers Chuck stays in the mid 2s and maybe NBC will extend the season to 22 episodes. I could see two hours block during May sweeps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In those free hours that NBC got now moving leno, they should put at least some re-runs for the new viewers to at least understand better whats going on.&#8221;</p>
<p>That will NEVER happen. Reruns of Chuck does considerably worst than reruns of any of the L&amp;O franchises as demonstrated 2 summers ago when NBC aired reruns of Chuck on Saturdays.</p>
<p>Just cross your fingers Chuck stays in the mid 2s and maybe NBC will extend the season to 22 episodes. I could see two hours block during May sweeps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-5/#comment-186472</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186472</guid>
		<description>Thankgod!
I was hoping for a strong start, and we got one!
Nice one NBC!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thankgod!<br />
I was hoping for a strong start, and we got one!<br />
Nice one NBC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andres</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-5/#comment-186463</link>
		<dc:creator>Andres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186463</guid>
		<description>Hi, Im happy with Chuck results. However I agree with some people that, it could&#039;ve been better ( to attract new viewers). Tonight is the real test.

In those free hours that NBC got now moving leno, they should put at least some re-runs for the new viewers to at least understand better whats going on. 

Chuck all the way!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Im happy with Chuck results. However I agree with some people that, it could&#8217;ve been better ( to attract new viewers). Tonight is the real test.</p>
<p>In those free hours that NBC got now moving leno, they should put at least some re-runs for the new viewers to at least understand better whats going on. </p>
<p>Chuck all the way!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pakopako</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-5/#comment-186457</link>
		<dc:creator>pakopako</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186457</guid>
		<description>Worse? Chuck was on Sunday where, it seems, more non-dedicated fans were watching... and still watching well in the fourth quarter-hour!

Sure, Chuck won&#039;t single-handedly save NBC/Universal/GE/ComCast, but these are GOOD signs!

Sure, this might be false hope, but more Strahovski and Baldwin! (and maybe have cameos of C.S. Lee as Harry T. Tang or Julia Ling as a CIA agent)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worse? Chuck was on Sunday where, it seems, more non-dedicated fans were watching&#8230; and still watching well in the fourth quarter-hour!</p>
<p>Sure, Chuck won&#8217;t single-handedly save NBC/Universal/GE/ComCast, but these are GOOD signs!</p>
<p>Sure, this might be false hope, but more Strahovski and Baldwin! (and maybe have cameos of C.S. Lee as Harry T. Tang or Julia Ling as a CIA agent)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-5/#comment-186434</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186434</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad it increased it&#039;s viewers but, like lots of other people think, I assume it&#039;ll be worse tonight.  I&#039;m also like a lot of people that thought the first hour wasn&#039;t that great.  And I&#039;m a huge fan.  The 2nd episode was vastly superior and I hope tonight&#039;s and the rest of the season are more of that caliber.  Casey&#039;s mad machine gunning was just embarrassing.  Haha.  Extremely lame.  I was hiding my head under the couch cushions.  &quot;I begged people to watch THIS???&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad it increased it&#8217;s viewers but, like lots of other people think, I assume it&#8217;ll be worse tonight.  I&#8217;m also like a lot of people that thought the first hour wasn&#8217;t that great.  And I&#8217;m a huge fan.  The 2nd episode was vastly superior and I hope tonight&#8217;s and the rest of the season are more of that caliber.  Casey&#8217;s mad machine gunning was just embarrassing.  Haha.  Extremely lame.  I was hiding my head under the couch cushions.  &#8220;I begged people to watch THIS???&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-5/#comment-186426</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186426</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s your shot NBC. Start a strong Sunday night line-up with Chuck, and build on it. It would obviously continue to grow if it aired Sundays at 9pm all season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s your shot NBC. Start a strong Sunday night line-up with Chuck, and build on it. It would obviously continue to grow if it aired Sundays at 9pm all season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IdleThoughts</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-5/#comment-186419</link>
		<dc:creator>IdleThoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186419</guid>
		<description>That is just increadable news.  To think that the greatest show in the history of television is finally getting some of the recognition it deserves leaves me with the warm and fuzzies!  Now we can only hope, my fellow Chucksters, that it continues to hold its own against House and the other rivals it has in that 8pm Monday time slot.

VIVA LA CHUCK!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is just increadable news.  To think that the greatest show in the history of television is finally getting some of the recognition it deserves leaves me with the warm and fuzzies!  Now we can only hope, my fellow Chucksters, that it continues to hold its own against House and the other rivals it has in that 8pm Monday time slot.</p>
<p>VIVA LA CHUCK!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-5/#comment-186415</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186415</guid>
		<description>thank all the firefly fans wich miss Jayne Cobb and love to see Alec Baldwin !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank all the firefly fans wich miss Jayne Cobb and love to see Alec Baldwin !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: witheringrose</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/01/11/chuck-season-3-premiere-ratings-yay/38337/comment-page-5/#comment-186412</link>
		<dc:creator>witheringrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=38337#comment-186412</guid>
		<description>Maybe a Chuck sandwich night during sweeps? NBC will probably air L&amp;O: CI, dateline, etc. after the Olympics; but do they want to air them during during May sweeps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe a Chuck sandwich night during sweeps? NBC will probably air L&amp;O: CI, dateline, etc. after the Olympics; but do they want to air them during during May sweeps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

