<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Guess For Super Bowl XLIV&#039;s Viewership?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:36:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Would Brett Favre Have Made Super-Bowl Viewership Even Higher? &#124; chicago.rssible.com</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-4/#comment-206892</link>
		<dc:creator>Would Brett Favre Have Made Super-Bowl Viewership Even Higher? &#124; chicago.rssible.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-206892</guid>
		<description>[...] New Orleans was the biggest emotional driver here, and may have led to more people tuning in. And if you look at the line graph of Super Bowl viewership throughout history, though viewership has increased in each of the past five years, this was the biggest one-year jump [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New Orleans was the biggest emotional driver here, and may have led to more people tuning in. And if you look at the line graph of Super Bowl viewership throughout history, though viewership has increased in each of the past five years, this was the biggest one-year jump [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Would Brett Favre Have Made Super-Bowl Viewership Even Higher? &#124; MOUTHPIECE Blog // A Chicago-Addled Sports Blog</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-4/#comment-206548</link>
		<dc:creator>Would Brett Favre Have Made Super-Bowl Viewership Even Higher? &#124; MOUTHPIECE Blog // A Chicago-Addled Sports Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-206548</guid>
		<description>[...] New Orleans was the biggest emotional driver here, and may have led to more people tuning in. And if you look at the line graph of Super Bowl viewership throughout history, though viewership has increased in each of the past five years, this was the biggest one-year jump [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New Orleans was the biggest emotional driver here, and may have led to more people tuning in. And if you look at the line graph of Super Bowl viewership throughout history, though viewership has increased in each of the past five years, this was the biggest one-year jump [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From Chumps to Champs! &#171; Dream B.I.G. in 3D!</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-206243</link>
		<dc:creator>From Chumps to Champs! &#171; Dream B.I.G. in 3D!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-206243</guid>
		<description>[...] personal development, sports on February 8, 2010 at 9:50 am  Of course by now everyone (or at least 100 million of us) knows the New Orleans Saints won the Super Bowl yesterday. It was definitely an exciting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] personal development, sports on February 8, 2010 at 9:50 am  Of course by now everyone (or at least 100 million of us) knows the New Orleans Saints won the Super Bowl yesterday. It was definitely an exciting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dario</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205978</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205978</guid>
		<description>102.567 mil. viewers :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>102.567 mil. viewers <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spotupj</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205824</link>
		<dc:creator>spotupj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205824</guid>
		<description>No way we&#039;re getting three great Super Bowls in a row, right?  I think there&#039;s a good chance this one could be lopsided, so I&#039;m saying 97 mil or so. If it&#039;s another classic, though, it could be a record-setter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way we&#8217;re getting three great Super Bowls in a row, right?  I think there&#8217;s a good chance this one could be lopsided, so I&#8217;m saying 97 mil or so. If it&#8217;s another classic, though, it could be a record-setter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205760</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205760</guid>
		<description>95.58 million with a 42.3 share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>95.58 million with a 42.3 share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205733</link>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 03:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205733</guid>
		<description>Beetween 102 to 107 million viewers! It depend how the game goes!

Post-game show: 76 million viewers

undercover boss: 36 million viewers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beetween 102 to 107 million viewers! It depend how the game goes!</p>
<p>Post-game show: 76 million viewers</p>
<p>undercover boss: 36 million viewers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt S.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205687</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205687</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m starting to think that since &quot;hundreds of thousands&quot; of people are without power in the mid-atlantic, and older battery powered TV&#039;s don&#039;t pick up digital signals, it might ruin the whole &quot;keep people home&quot; angle. They might be more liable to go out to watch the game if they are without power. 

I still think it will do 100 mil, but not much more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m starting to think that since &#8220;hundreds of thousands&#8221; of people are without power in the mid-atlantic, and older battery powered TV&#8217;s don&#8217;t pick up digital signals, it might ruin the whole &#8220;keep people home&#8221; angle. They might be more liable to go out to watch the game if they are without power. </p>
<p>I still think it will do 100 mil, but not much more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMD78</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205651</link>
		<dc:creator>MMD78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205651</guid>
		<description>97.6 million</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>97.6 million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205639</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 22:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205639</guid>
		<description>101.4 million. The blizzard out east will keep people home.

Wonder what the opening ceremonies of the Olympics will have for numbers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>101.4 million. The blizzard out east will keep people home.</p>
<p>Wonder what the opening ceremonies of the Olympics will have for numbers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Hughes</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205596</link>
		<dc:creator>William Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 22:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205596</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t want to see a repeat of 2004!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t want to see a repeat of 2004!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moraliste</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205553</link>
		<dc:creator>moraliste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205553</guid>
		<description>What we&#039;re really trying to guess is will it be close or a blowout. But then again, assuming the Colts get a sizeable lead, NO is one team which can mount a comeback try with every possession. 101.5 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we&#8217;re really trying to guess is will it be close or a blowout. But then again, assuming the Colts get a sizeable lead, NO is one team which can mount a comeback try with every possession. 101.5 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew C.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205510</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205510</guid>
		<description>CVI million. Definitely over C and I would not be surprised by CX or CXV!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CVI million. Definitely over C and I would not be surprised by CX or CXV!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205394</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205394</guid>
		<description>Tough one, the real question is if it&#039;s going to break 100 mil or not. My Magic 8 Ball says &quot;All signs point to Yes!&quot; so lets say 100.23 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tough one, the real question is if it&#8217;s going to break 100 mil or not. My Magic 8 Ball says &#8220;All signs point to Yes!&#8221; so lets say 100.23 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205383</link>
		<dc:creator>red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 12:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205383</guid>
		<description>109.6 million viewers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>109.6 million viewers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AtCat</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205352</link>
		<dc:creator>AtCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205352</guid>
		<description>However for those who watch the Super Bowl just for the game itself and not the commercials, halftime show, or anything else. The viewership would be: 45.6 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However for those who watch the Super Bowl just for the game itself and not the commercials, halftime show, or anything else. The viewership would be: 45.6 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AtCat</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205351</link>
		<dc:creator>AtCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205351</guid>
		<description>99.9 million</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>99.9 million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205334</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 05:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205334</guid>
		<description>100.5 million</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100.5 million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.J.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205319</link>
		<dc:creator>C.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 04:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205319</guid>
		<description>I dunno about the share, but I have plenty of confidence that it could break the century mark in viewers and be the most watched Super Bowl ever. :)

And I agree about the bad weather back East being a factor, that was one of the reasons that made Super Bowl XVI (1982) the biggest in audience share ever.

Oh what the hey, it&#039;s gonna be a great game this year. I&#039;ll definitely be glued to the TV. :)

P.S.-A personal note, I was born on the same day as Super Bowl XXI!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno about the share, but I have plenty of confidence that it could break the century mark in viewers and be the most watched Super Bowl ever. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And I agree about the bad weather back East being a factor, that was one of the reasons that made Super Bowl XVI (1982) the biggest in audience share ever.</p>
<p>Oh what the hey, it&#8217;s gonna be a great game this year. I&#8217;ll definitely be glued to the TV. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>P.S.-A personal note, I was born on the same day as Super Bowl XXI!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aznfratboy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205315</link>
		<dc:creator>aznfratboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 04:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205315</guid>
		<description>99.x million viewers, I think we will have to wait until 2011 for 100 million viewers to watch the Superbowl, neilsen tracker-wise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>99.x million viewers, I think we will have to wait until 2011 for 100 million viewers to watch the Superbowl, neilsen tracker-wise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205263</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205263</guid>
		<description>98.4. Weather a is good point, but without Brett and the Vikings I&#039;m going to say lower than what I would have said a few weeks ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>98.4. Weather a is good point, but without Brett and the Vikings I&#8217;m going to say lower than what I would have said a few weeks ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crispin</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-3/#comment-205249</link>
		<dc:creator>Crispin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205249</guid>
		<description>105,000,000 if it stays close...95,000,000 if its a blow out

I&#039;m thinking though it will be close</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>105,000,000 if it stays close&#8230;95,000,000 if its a blow out</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking though it will be close</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ern.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205228</link>
		<dc:creator>ern.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205228</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ve not looked forward to a SB halftime show since Prince in 2007.

i (surprisingly) liked Springsteen (not a fan of his) last year.

i don&#039;t think just 1 act should be in the halftime show. i remember in 2001 when they had Aerosmith, NSYNC, Mary J Blige, etc etc etc. now i was only like 11 but i didn&#039;t watch football at the time and yet i watched that halftime show OVER AND OVER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve not looked forward to a SB halftime show since Prince in 2007.</p>
<p>i (surprisingly) liked Springsteen (not a fan of his) last year.</p>
<p>i don&#8217;t think just 1 act should be in the halftime show. i remember in 2001 when they had Aerosmith, NSYNC, Mary J Blige, etc etc etc. now i was only like 11 but i didn&#8217;t watch football at the time and yet i watched that halftime show OVER AND OVER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205186</link>
		<dc:creator>Acey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205186</guid>
		<description>Haha! @Worldwide Pants and Jared.

Good point about the weather in the east... but no way it gets over 105 million. Not happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha! @Worldwide Pants and Jared.</p>
<p>Good point about the weather in the east&#8230; but no way it gets over 105 million. Not happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205140</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205140</guid>
		<description>dave, halftime is definitely part of the game for ratings purposes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dave, halftime is definitely part of the game for ratings purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205138</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205138</guid>
		<description>Last years, and the year before both produced games that were exciting right up to the final play. Both produced record numbers. I&#039;d assume that everything else equal viewership would rise year to year, given an increase in NFL interest and US population. With that said I predict a significant drop in average viewership, because most football games, even between two close teams don&#039;t come down to the last play so chances are this game won&#039;t. Every snap after the game has essentially been decided is going to see large drop offs in viewers, effecting the final numbers. 96 million. Plus I don&#039;t know if halftime numbers count but if they do, then I expect more people to flip away from The Who than Prince.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last years, and the year before both produced games that were exciting right up to the final play. Both produced record numbers. I&#8217;d assume that everything else equal viewership would rise year to year, given an increase in NFL interest and US population. With that said I predict a significant drop in average viewership, because most football games, even between two close teams don&#8217;t come down to the last play so chances are this game won&#8217;t. Every snap after the game has essentially been decided is going to see large drop offs in viewers, effecting the final numbers. 96 million. Plus I don&#8217;t know if halftime numbers count but if they do, then I expect more people to flip away from The Who than Prince.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205129</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205129</guid>
		<description>104.7 million</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>104.7 million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205117</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205117</guid>
		<description>Since the ratings are no more than a guessing game. i&#039;ll play along
109 million, 50.1 rating, 69 share</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the ratings are no more than a guessing game. i&#8217;ll play along<br />
109 million, 50.1 rating, 69 share</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vamp Mom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205110</link>
		<dc:creator>Vamp Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205110</guid>
		<description>Jared - I love your guess.  LMFAO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jared &#8211; I love your guess.  LMFAO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manar</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205107</link>
		<dc:creator>Manar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205107</guid>
		<description>102.45 million</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>102.45 million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Really Tired</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205098</link>
		<dc:creator>Really Tired</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205098</guid>
		<description>96M.  I won&#039;t be watching much, so subtract 1.

Is it baseball season yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>96M.  I won&#8217;t be watching much, so subtract 1.</p>
<p>Is it baseball season yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: romo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205097</link>
		<dc:creator>romo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205097</guid>
		<description>To chris:

i thought mash finale was 105,900,000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To chris:</p>
<p>i thought mash finale was 105,900,000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Worldwide Pants</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205091</link>
		<dc:creator>Worldwide Pants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205091</guid>
		<description>Lou, great point about the lousy weather in the east.  Assuming they have power to watch the game:

110 million.

But given it&#039;s CBS, they&#039;ll finish second in the demo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lou, great point about the lousy weather in the east.  Assuming they have power to watch the game:</p>
<p>110 million.</p>
<p>But given it&#8217;s CBS, they&#8217;ll finish second in the demo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reneg</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205087</link>
		<dc:creator>reneg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205087</guid>
		<description>105 Million</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>105 Million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ern.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205085</link>
		<dc:creator>ern.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205085</guid>
		<description>@Chris GREAT POINT.

alot of us over here on the east are gonna be stuck at home and we all know nobody is dumb enough to compete with the SB. theres not gonna be anything else on tv (more than likely) so that should help the rating</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris GREAT POINT.</p>
<p>alot of us over here on the east are gonna be stuck at home and we all know nobody is dumb enough to compete with the SB. theres not gonna be anything else on tv (more than likely) so that should help the rating</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205081</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205081</guid>
		<description>My guess: a shitload of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess: a shitload of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205080</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205080</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say in the 100 to 103 range. But I&#039;ll guess 101.5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say in the 100 to 103 range. But I&#8217;ll guess 101.5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205078</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205078</guid>
		<description>NFL ratings have absolutely soared this year, with the AFC Championship game on CBS drawing 46.9 million, the NFC Championship game on FOX drawing 57.9 million, the Pro Bowl on ESPN drawing 12 million (highest-rated in a decade), and this Wednesday&#039;s Super Bowl&#039;s Greatest Commercials on CBS drawing 11 million (biggest audience ever for that special).

That said, the way NFL TV ratings have trended this season, combined with the Eastern Seaboard probably getting snowed in, I predict this will surpass the M*A*S*H series finale (107.9 million) as the highest-rated program in television history. My prediction: 120 million.

As for the new series &quot;Undercover Boss&quot; that CBS will premiere after the game, I predict it will retain a pretty good portion of the audience. Prediction: 40 million</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NFL ratings have absolutely soared this year, with the AFC Championship game on CBS drawing 46.9 million, the NFC Championship game on FOX drawing 57.9 million, the Pro Bowl on ESPN drawing 12 million (highest-rated in a decade), and this Wednesday&#8217;s Super Bowl&#8217;s Greatest Commercials on CBS drawing 11 million (biggest audience ever for that special).</p>
<p>That said, the way NFL TV ratings have trended this season, combined with the Eastern Seaboard probably getting snowed in, I predict this will surpass the M*A*S*H series finale (107.9 million) as the highest-rated program in television history. My prediction: 120 million.</p>
<p>As for the new series &#8220;Undercover Boss&#8221; that CBS will premiere after the game, I predict it will retain a pretty good portion of the audience. Prediction: 40 million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205074</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205074</guid>
		<description>Beacuase of the lousy weather on the east coast, 107 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beacuase of the lousy weather on the east coast, 107 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mootrain</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205073</link>
		<dc:creator>mootrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205073</guid>
		<description>2.3 / 4 share. 3.5 mil viewers. 

I&#039;m going to be watching the puppy bowl on animal planet (complete with kitty half time show)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2.3 / 4 share. 3.5 mil viewers. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to be watching the puppy bowl on animal planet (complete with kitty half time show)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt S.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205071</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205071</guid>
		<description>I agree, 100 mil sounds right. I can&#039;t see it topping XLII&#039;s share, but you never know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, 100 mil sounds right. I can&#8217;t see it topping XLII&#8217;s share, but you never know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205068</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205068</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say it will break 100 million. Two very good, competitive teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say it will break 100 million. Two very good, competitive teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-2/#comment-205062</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205062</guid>
		<description>like 103 million viewers, with a 43 rating</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like 103 million viewers, with a 43 rating</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quinn</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-1/#comment-205059</link>
		<dc:creator>Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205059</guid>
		<description>104 million</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>104 million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ern.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-1/#comment-205052</link>
		<dc:creator>ern.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205052</guid>
		<description>if theres one thing we know about NFL QB&#039;s and ratings its that Favre and Manning can draw

any SB with either of them is gonna be pretty highly rated so i think if the Vikings would&#039;ve made it it would be a sure 100+ million

but its still Manning. and the Saints are pretty popular. i haven&#039;t watched ANY sports since the championship games but i&#039;m sure ESPN is playing the Katrina card to get sympathy. i&#039;ma still guess its gonna get over 100 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if theres one thing we know about NFL QB&#8217;s and ratings its that Favre and Manning can draw</p>
<p>any SB with either of them is gonna be pretty highly rated so i think if the Vikings would&#8217;ve made it it would be a sure 100+ million</p>
<p>but its still Manning. and the Saints are pretty popular. i haven&#8217;t watched ANY sports since the championship games but i&#8217;m sure ESPN is playing the Katrina card to get sympathy. i&#8217;ma still guess its gonna get over 100 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe D</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-1/#comment-205050</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205050</guid>
		<description>101 million</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>101 million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-1/#comment-205048</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205048</guid>
		<description>I would say 99-101m depending on how the match goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say 99-101m depending on how the match goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the128boy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-1/#comment-205046</link>
		<dc:creator>the128boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205046</guid>
		<description>109.0 million</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>109.0 million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nightstar</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-1/#comment-205045</link>
		<dc:creator>Nightstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205045</guid>
		<description>RE: who cares?

Well, if you don&#039;t, then so be it.  To each their own.  However, probably around 100 million people, at the least, will be watching the game, based on historical data.  Many more who, for some reason, might not be able to (or will be somewhere they can&#039;t be recorded as a viewer, like a bar) but will have some interest in the outcome.  

I&#039;m not going to be watching -- I quit watching the NFL a long time ago -- but I still maintain a curiosity about the Super Bowl.  Given the reasons in this post for positives and negatives on the ratings (and agreeing with all of them), and anticipating a competitive game, I am going to guess 105 million with a 44.3 ratings.  Just for fun.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: who cares?</p>
<p>Well, if you don&#8217;t, then so be it.  To each their own.  However, probably around 100 million people, at the least, will be watching the game, based on historical data.  Many more who, for some reason, might not be able to (or will be somewhere they can&#8217;t be recorded as a viewer, like a bar) but will have some interest in the outcome.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to be watching &#8212; I quit watching the NFL a long time ago &#8212; but I still maintain a curiosity about the Super Bowl.  Given the reasons in this post for positives and negatives on the ratings (and agreeing with all of them), and anticipating a competitive game, I am going to guess 105 million with a 44.3 ratings.  Just for fun.  <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: romo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/02/05/your-guess-for-super-bowl-xlivs-viewership/41176/comment-page-1/#comment-205040</link>
		<dc:creator>romo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=41176#comment-205040</guid>
		<description>Total viewers (the 6+ minute #) 153,137,000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Total viewers (the 6+ minute #) 153,137,000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

