In the fourth in a series of posts with relative geographic TV market ratings information from the helpful folks at Rentrak, we've got a map of the relative TV ratings in 200 markets for ABC's top rated show Modern Family.
The relative ratings map for Modern Family seems to most resemble those for Castle and Hawaii Five-0 I posted some time ago, although it seems like Modern Family has a particularly strong affiinity for people in the upper Mid-West and the Great Lakes region.
Amateur geo-ratings analysts have at it!
To see all our posts with TV Ratings Maps click here.
-
View 'Modern Family' Relative Ratings By TV Market in a full screen map
-
How to read the map: The markets are color coded based on their relative ratings Index. 100 = the US national average rating for the show. 50 = half the US national average rating for the show, 200= twice the national average rating for the show, etc. The individual markers are clickable, and I've included the entire set of data below for those who want to go crazy with their own analysis.
-
| City | State | Index to Nat'l |
| Victoria | TX | 257 |
| Wilkes Barre | PA | 184 |
| Toledo | OH | 180 |
| Flint | MI | 166 |
| El Paso | TX | 166 |
| Cedar Rapids | IA | 165 |
| Harlingen | TX | 162 |
| Green Bay | WI | 160 |
| Fresno | CA | 160 |
| Erie | PA | 156 |
| Grand Rapids | MI | 150 |
| Rochester | NY | 150 |
| Corpus Christi | TX | 149 |
| Atlanta | GA | 148 |
| Bowling Green | KY | 146 |
| Madison | WI | 145 |
| Cleveland | OH | 144 |
| Omaha | NE | 144 |
| Meridian | MS | 143 |
| Ft. Wayne | IN | 140 |
| Columbus | GA | 140 |
| Idaho Falls | ID | 138 |
| Chicago | IL | 137 |
| Cincinnati | OH | 137 |
| Milwaukee | WI | 137 |
| Chattanooga | TN | 134 |
| San Antonio | TX | 133 |
| Pittsburgh | PA | 133 |
| Louisville | KY | 131 |
| Columbus | OH | 131 |
| Charlotte | NC | 131 |
| Fargo | ND | 130 |
| Indianapolis | IN | 129 |
| Gainesville | FL | 128 |
| Houston | TX | 128 |
| Detroit | MI | 127 |
| Wausau | WI | 126 |
| Lincoln | NE | 125 |
| Minneapolis | MN | 124 |
| Oklahoma City | OK | 123 |
| Kansas City | MO | 121 |
| Albuquerque | NM | 121 |
| Syracuse | NY | 121 |
| Boston | MA | 120 |
| Raleigh | NC | 120 |
| Youngstown | OH | 117 |
| Champaign | IL | 116 |
| Rapid City | SD | 116 |
| Duluth | MN | 116 |
| Reno | NV | 116 |
| Davenport | IA | 114 |
| Austin | TX | 112 |
| Los Angeles | CA | 112 |
| Buffalo | NY | 112 |
| Philadelphia | PA | 111 |
| Wichita | KS | 109 |
| Sioux City | IA | 109 |
| Hartford | CT | 109 |
| Medford | OR | 108 |
| Little Rock | AR | 108 |
| Portland | ME | 107 |
| Charlottesville | VA | 107 |
| Colorado Springs | CO | 107 |
| Harrisonburg | VA | 107 |
| Tyler | TX | 106 |
| Charleston | SC | 106 |
| Greenville | SC | 106 |
| Harrisburg | PA | 106 |
| Dayton | OH | 105 |
| Monterey | CA | 105 |
| Eugene | OR | 105 |
| Ft. Smith | AR | 104 |
| Joplin | MO | 104 |
| Evansville | IN | 104 |
| Lansing | MI | 103 |
| Bakersfield | CA | 103 |
| Columbia | SC | 103 |
| Portland | OR | 103 |
| Jackson | TN | 103 |
| Lafayette | LA | 102 |
| Nashville | TN | 102 |
| Orlando | FL | 101 |
| Helena | MT | 101 |
| Dallas | TX | 100 |
| Knoxville | TN | 100 |
| Ottumwa | IA | 99 |
| Chico | CA | 98 |
| Norfolk | VA | 97 |
| Great Falls | MT | 97 |
| Sioux Falls | SD | 97 |
| Albany | NY | 97 |
| Mason City | IA | 97 |
| Denver | CO | 96 |
| Peoria | IL | 96 |
| Wichita Falls | TX | 95 |
| La Crosse | WI | 95 |
| Mobile | AL | 95 |
| Spokane | WA | 95 |
| Richmond | VA | 94 |
| Rockford | IL | 94 |
| Tucson | AZ | 93 |
| Augusta | GA | 93 |
| Tulsa | OK | 93 |
| San Francisco | CA | 93 |
| New York | NY | 92 |
| Birmingham | AL | 92 |
| Grnd Jnctn | CO | 92 |
| Santa Barbara | CA | 91 |
| Miami | FL | 91 |
| South Bend | IN | 90 |
| Sacramento | CA | 90 |
| Salt Lake City | UT | 89 |
| Abilene | TX | 89 |
| Terre Haute | IN | 87 |
| Amarillo | TX | 87 |
| San Diego | CA | 87 |
| Bend | OR | 86 |
| Jonesboro | AR | 85 |
| Boise | ID | 85 |
| Lima | OH | 85 |
| Seattle | WA | 85 |
| West Palm Beach | FL | 84 |
| Roanoke | VA | 84 |
| Jackson | MS | 83 |
| Des Moines | IA | 83 |
| Baton Rouge | LA | 82 |
| Bangor | ME | 81 |
| Washington | DC | 80 |
| Columbia | MO | 80 |
| Shreveport | LA | 79 |
| Panama City | FL | 79 |
| Topeka | KS | 79 |
| Mankato | MN | 79 |
| Beaumont | TX | 78 |
| Ft. Myers | FL | 78 |
| Paducah | KY | 76 |
| Providence | RI | 76 |
| Greenville | NC | 76 |
| Lubbock | TX | 75 |
| Baltimore | MD | 75 |
| Charleston | WV | 75 |
| Springfield | MO | 74 |
| Phoenix | AZ | 73 |
| Johnstown | PA | 72 |
| Lexington | KY | 72 |
| St. Louis | MO | 71 |
| Yakima | WA | 71 |
| Cheyenne | WY | 71 |
| Burlington | VT | 70 |
| Jacksonville | FL | 70 |
| Wilmington | NC | 70 |
| Butte | MT | 69 |
| Marquette | MI | 68 |
| Wheeling | WV | 68 |
| Palm Springs | CA | 68 |
| Waco | TX | 68 |
| Traverse City | MI | 68 |
| Casper | WY | 66 |
| Missoula | MT | 66 |
| Honolulu | HI | 63 |
| Billings | MT | 62 |
| Odessa | TX | 62 |
| Las Vegas | NV | 61 |
| Tampa | FL | 61 |
| Huntsville | AL | 59 |
| New Orleans | LA | 57 |
| Memphis | TN | 56 |
| Tallahassee | FL | 55 |
| Yuma | AZ | 55 |
| Bismarck | ND | 54 |
| Alpena | MI | 54 |
| Biloxi | MS | 54 |
| Florence | SC | 53 |
| Binghamton | NY | 52 |
| Greensboro | NC | 52 |
| Twin Falls | ID | 52 |
| Elmira | NY | 49 |
| Eureka | CA | 48 |
| Savannah | GA | 48 |
| Fairbanks | AK | 48 |
| San Angelo | TX | 47 |
| Watertown | NY | 46 |
| Quincy | IL | 45 |
| Clarksburg | WV | 44 |
| Dothan | AL | 43 |
| Greenwood | MS | 42 |
| Anchorage | AK | 41 |
| Tri-Cities | TN | 39 |
| Utica | NY | 38 |
| Montgomery | AL | 38 |
| Macon | GA | 38 |
| Monroe | LA | 38 |
| Sherman | TX | 35 |
| Columbus | MS | 32 |
| Juneau | AK | 32 |
| Beckley | WV | 30 |
| Albany | GA | 29 |
| Alexandria | LA | 23 |
| Parkersbrg | WV | 11 |
| Salisbury | MD | 11 |
| Lafayette | IN | 11 |
| Presque Isle | ME | 7 |
-
© Rentrak Corporation 2012 - Content in this chart is produced and/or compiled by Rentrak Corporation and its TV Essentials data collection and analytical service, and is covered by provisions of the Copyright Act. The material presented herein is intended to be available for public use. You may reproduce the content of the chart in any format or MEDIUM without first obtaining permission, subject to the following requirements: (1) the material must be reproduced accurately; and (2) any publication or issuance of any part of the material to others must acknowledge Rentrak Corporation as the source of the material.
