Cable News Ratings for Thursday, October 4, 2012

Categories: '

(520) Comments - Add Yours!

1. Doug Z

   Posted October 8, 2012 at 9:11 AM

   Faith3 this paper is over 100pages long. Post all of it. No editing which is what the Dems, Libs, alphabet news media does not like when against them. But loves when for them

2. Mark

   Posted October 8, 2012 at 9:14 AM

   So here is my take from Romney’s Foreign Policy briefing

   I’ll take every stance Obama has but I will do it American style as opposed to the way Obama does it, no specifics needed.

3. Doug Z

   Posted October 8, 2012 at 9:14 AM

   Mark

   Obama the worst President in history
   Bush is the second worst President in history

4. Doug Z

   Posted October 8, 2012 at 9:15 AM

   Mark their is no where to hid for Bush or Obama.

5. C Bailey

   Posted October 8, 2012 at 9:19 AM

   WOW….the leftys are EXCITED that we are exactly right back where we started FOUR years ago with this 7.8%! CONGRATS! GOOD JOB! how embarassing for you people.

6. UpAndOver

   Posted October 8, 2012 at 9:20 AM

   47% of the obama funds may have come from foreign nationals…

   Will obama allow the true source of the donations…

   One click of the server will show the origination of all donations…

   Time to come clean obama…

7. PaulG

   Posted October 8, 2012 at 9:23 AM

   @Jeff

   @PaulG
   My Fictitious meetings? Again I am afraid you are commenting out of ignorance, and self serving convenience. You are also cherry picking parts of the exchanges that suit your current momentary fixations. Which indicates, your inability to attend such a meeting you proclaim to have such a vast in-depth knowledge of, or what a HIGH LEVEL business meeting SHOULD be about according to the book of PaulG. But, just like a few other man-child individuals that claim to know who and what everyone does and does not do in their personal & professional lives, you loose credibility and your argument. Your claims are invalid on so many levels.
   _____________________________________________________________

   As always,,you turn to personal attacks to defend your comments,,where did I claim I sat in on “HIGH LEVEL” business meetings??Mine is the perspective of a 53 year old retired small businessman who has been fortunate enough to put his signature on dozens of commercial leases and bank loans and realizes the risks and trepidation in doing so..Your claim that “I’d fire the idiot, or expect to be fired if I talked like that in such a setting” for expressing concern about an upcoming election and it’s impact on expenses and market conditions,,is ridiculous..If you would like to show me where I’m wrong or miscontrued your comment,,without the ad hominem,,have at it..On as many levels as you like..

8. Ratboy

   Posted October 8, 2012 at 9:29 AM

   Thanks Dana. I would guess it would bother most so I am not sure why he (or anyone else is ever called out on it by the group he is addressing.

9. Faith3

   Posted October 8, 2012 at 9:36 AM

   Doug, You should read the entire paper. I’m going to prove to you that he did state revenue will go up $81 billion and I will quote what he says, “That is under these assumptions, taxpayers with incomes of $100,000 or more would pay $81 billion more in taxes. All the math is done as he shows how this will happen and he also goes on to do the math for the $200,000 group whose income, unlike the $100,000 group, will remain around a net zero in gains and losses. He’s also very careful not to put in his own definition of high income vs middle income. He states, “Since who is “high income” is in the eye of the beholder, I again do the analysis twice, once for households with $100,000 or more and once only for households with $200,000 or more.” -www.princeton.edu/ceps/workingpapers/228rosen.pdf

10. Sicilian Papa

    Posted October 8, 2012 at 9:37 AM

    @

    Ratboy

    President Obama is speaking today to some “fellas” at the local social club.

    He says he’s gonna give doos guys a couple two tree tings to tink about ha.

    Yous guys gotta start earnin the c-notes. Utterwise I got to go to work. If that happens some of yous is gonna get wacked.

11. Ratboy

    Posted October 8, 2012 at 9:38 AM

    I wanna know how come us R’s cant have a chance to win trips and stuff!!! I get emails from the DNC saying I can win trips and stuff if I donate!!

    Maybe we DO need some entitlements!!

12. Ratboy

    Posted October 8, 2012 at 9:39 AM

    Hey Papa, you forgt Badda Bing badda booom!

13. Doug Z

    Posted October 8, 2012 at 9:47 AM

    Faith3

    Why would Rosin, a Demo, Lib, Jew , support the enemy.Romney

14. Letmethink

    Posted October 8, 2012 at 9:47 AM

    The main point from Mr Rosen to be noted explains why he is upset with the obama speech which he says misconstrues what he wrote. I think this quote has been posted before but this is the essence of his paper:

    “The main conclusion of my study is that under plausible assumptions, a proposal along the lines suggested by Governor Romney can both be revenue neutral and keep the net tax burden on taxpayers with incomes above $200,000 about the same. That is, an increase in the tax burden on lower and middle income individuals is not required in order to make the overall plan revenue neutral.”

    Guess everyone will take what they want from this so probably time to agree to disagree and move on.

15. Sicilian Papa

    Posted October 8, 2012 at 9:50 AM

    @

    Up and Over

    There’s that 47% again. If, and I do mean if the corrupt lib. media does report that story it will be an excuse to bring up the 47% fundraising video. The Obama campaigns strategy is 47%. Vote for Obama and become one of the 47%.

16. Coffee Steve

    Posted October 8, 2012 at 9:54 AM

    @Faith3
    Get me a turkey sub.

    That’s what I had, had 2 teeth pulled and anything else would have been a challenge to chew. And I just read the story on Rosen. If I get a chance I will read his paper.

    I’ll be back after I get on my new treadmill, got to get back to 170 quickly so I can walk the beach without passing out

    Hey Rats? I got this treadmill that does everytong excpet give you water, the computer on this sucker is more tech than my car LOL, measures EKG, and Pulse and even reads to me

    BBL…. after 4 miles

17. Faith3

    Posted October 8, 2012 at 9:55 AM

    I don’t mind if you want to move on from it because I have no horse in this race but he covered himself by not defining people in the $100,000 household range as middle class so his statement holds true as long as we don’t call that group of people middle income. Really, the bottom line is he does clearly state in his paper that if taxes are increased on this group the revenue will remain tax neutral for those making over $200,000. This cannot be denied.

18. Faith3

    Posted October 8, 2012 at 9:58 AM

    Thanks for the sandwich Coffee! Next lunch on me.

    Doug, I don’t really care who Rosen wants as President.

19. Ratboy

    Posted October 8, 2012 at 10:03 AM

    @ Coffee Steve
    Hey Rats? I got this treadmill that does everytong excpet give you water

    I want to get one that walks for me too!! I have mine in my downstairs family room, walking shoes right next to it, sweats and a towel hanging over it……………………..I dust it once a week!

20. Sicilian Papa

    Posted October 8, 2012 at 10:11 AM

    Gallup tracking: Obama 50% Romney 45%. Obama 51% approval

    May be a one day anomaly or the unemployment number and calling Romney a liar helped.

    We may need another debate!!!!!

    Also Gallup has the unemployment rate down to 7.5%. At that rate we will be down to 5% by election day.