
Live + Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for Thursday, November 8, 2012
| P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) | ||
| Total Day | ||||
| FNC | 1,318 | 300 | 529 | |
| CNN | 518 | 163 | 237 | |
| MSNBC | 949 | 316 | 477 | |
| CNBC | 175 | 44 | 98 | |
| FBN | 76 | 18 | 35 | |
| HLN | 195 | 78 | 106 | |
| Primetime | P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) | |
| FNC | 2,026 | 418 | 775 | |
| CNN | 766 | 244 | 375 | |
| MSNBC | 1,701 | 514 | 832 | |
| CNBC | 193 | 80 | 113 | |
| FBN | 86 | 14 | 32 | |
| HLN | 276 | 99 | 132 | |
| Net | Morning programs (6-9 AM) | P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) |
| FNC | FOX & Friends | 1,317 | 304 | 601 |
| CNN | Early Start/Starting Point | 365 | 151 | 206 |
| MSNBC | Morning Joe | 847 | 331 | 467 |
| CNBC | Squawk Box | 142 | 31 | 90 |
| HLN | Morning Express w/ Meade | 208 | 124 | 157 |
| Net | 5PM | P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) |
| FNC | FIVE, THE | 2,153 | 458 | 788 |
| CNN | Situation Room | 632 | 162 | 221 |
| MSNBC | HARDBALL WITH C. MATTHEWS | 1,520 | 388 | 684 |
| CNBC | FAST MONEY | 241 | 32 | 133 |
| HLN | EVENING EXPRESS | 155 | 41 | 84 |
| Net | 6PM | P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) |
| FNC | SPECIAL RPT W/BRET BAIER | 2,395 | 334 | 740 |
| CNN | Situation Room | 676 | 224 | 282 |
| MSNBC | POLITICS NATION | 1,399 | 445 | 680 |
| CNBC | Mad Money | 167 | 67 | 101 |
| HLN | EVENING EXPRESS | 210 | 59 | 101 |
| Net | 7PM | P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) |
| FNC | The Fox Report W/S.SMITH | 2,015 | 388 | 727 |
| CNN | ERIN BURNETT OUTFRONT | 680 | 204 | 337 |
| MSNBC | HARDBALL WITH C. MATTHEWS | 1,380 | 453 | 677 |
| CNBC | Kudlow Report | 166 | 45 | 75 |
| HLN | JANE VELEZ-MITCHELL | 259 | 96 | 103 |
| Net | 8PM | P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) |
| FNC | THE OREILLY FACTOR | 2,494 | 553 | 915 |
| CNN | Anderson Cooper 360 | 805 | 240 | 373 |
| MSNBC | Ed Show | 1,736 | 476 | 794 |
| CNBC | MADOFF BEHIND BARS | 204 | 72 | 102 |
| HLN | Nancy Grace | 281 | 91 | 129 |
| Net | 9PM | P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) |
| FNC | Hannity | 1,836 | 325 | 664 |
| CNN | Piers Morgan Tonight | 870 | 247 | 419 |
| MSNBC | Rachel Maddow Show | 1,809 | 568 | 924 |
| CNBC | UNRAVELED | 188 | 83 | 122 |
| HLN | WHAT WOULD YOU DO | 319 | 117 | 159 |
| Net | 10PM | P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) |
| FNC | ON THE RECORD W/GRETA | 1,729 | 377 | 744 |
| CNN | Anderson Cooper 360 | 624 | 246 | 332 |
| MSNBC | Last Word W/ L. ODONNELL | 1,558 | 499 | 778 |
| CNBC | AMERICAN GREED | 162 | 72 | 93 |
| CNBC | UNRAVELED | 211 | 96 | 140 |
| HLN | WHAT WOULD YOU DO | 226 | 89 | 106 |
| Net | 11PM | P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) |
| FNC | THE OREILLY FACTOR | 1,158 | 348 | 562 |
| CNN | ERIN BURNETT OUTFRONT | 394 | 124 | 197 |
| MSNBC | Ed Show | 1,045 | 357 | 568 |
| CNBC | Mad Money | 125 | 75 | 96 |
| HLN | SHOWBIZ TONIGHT | 139 | 55 | 75 |
-
For other days cable news ratings click here.
P2+ = viewers over the age of 2
(25-54) = Adults 25-54 viewing
(35-64) = Adults 35-64 viewing
Prime Time = 8-11pm
LIVE+SD: The number that watched a program either while it was broadcast OR watched via DVR on the same day [through 3AM the next day] the program was broadcast. For more information see Numbers 101.
Scratch = when a show's audience fails to meet minimum Nielsen reporting levels. For more information go here.
Nielsen Cable Network Coverage Estimates (as of July, 2012)
CNN/HLN: 99.727 million HHs
CNBC: 97.497 million HHs
FNC: 97.981 million HHs
MSNBC: 95.526 million HHs
Fox Business: 68.407 million HHs
Nielsen TV Ratings Data: ©2012 The Nielsen Company. All Rights Reserved.











@TZCA
In case you didn’t know, Arithmetic is used to calculate Statistics.
@ Mark2
Posted November 12, 2012 at 1:03 PM
And to think that the Republican Party was considering Petraus for their VP pick.
I think Cantor didn’t tell anybody because he’s involved
You seem to be skirting the question and going back to Cantor.
@Mark2@TZCA
In case you didn’t know, Arithmetic is used to calculate Statistics.
Not always Mark2–sometimes a geometric mean is used instead of an arithmetic mean–
Mark2
Posted November 12, 2012 at 1:06 PM
In case you didn’t know, Arithmetic is used to calculate Statistics.
*******
That is a brillian deduction. And I can make the color purple with a red crayon and blue crayon.
Just because Statistics contains elements of Arithmetic, this does not make Statistics and Arithmetic one and the same.
@Faith3
I will take your word that you didn’t ever use the word ‘austerity.’ I skimmed over the earlier posts and didn’t see it used by you.
However, you did post this:
And for all practical purposes, from everything I’ve read on austerity as it applies to Greece, and from this definition “In economics, austerity refers to a policy of deficit-cutting by lowering spending via a reduction in the amount of benefits and public services provided,” it appears you were referring to austerity in your post. My apologies is this is not what you meant.
@TZCA “Just because Statistics contains elements of Arithmetic, this does not make Statistics and Arithmetic one and the same.”
Of course not, that’s why they have to different names and definitions. However, you can’t have statistics without math. So without real MATH, statistics would fail. Just like the Republicans failed with their statistics when it came to Presidential race predicitions because they used fantasy (fake) Math.
Didn’t you guys learn your lesson? LOL
^2
TZCA
Posted November 12, 2012 at 1:20 PM
…
*******
My position in the Classical Argument aspect of this debate still stands.
@Letmethink “Not always Mark2–sometimes a geometric mean is used instead of an arithmetic mean”
LMAO, are you serious?! You have no idea how much Math we use to calculate Geometric Mean.
@Mark2
And you, as well as the other 52% of the population who are more interested Kim Kardashian’s newest kitty and voted for Obama because he’s sexier than Romney, you fail to recognize that in order for the whole $5 in = $9.20 out, there has to be an element of faith that the assumptions driving the statistical deviations from the geometric mean will come true. I don’t learn my lessons from the actions of gullible masses, my friend.
TZCA,
I stated rather clearly the word “neoliberal” policy which is not at all related to topic of Austerity.
@Mark2Of course not, that’s why they have to different names and definitions. However, you can’t have statistics without math. So without real MATH, statistics would fail. Just like the Republicans failed with their statistics when it came to Presidential race predicitions because they used fantasy (fake) Math.
The crazy thing about statistics is that the results tend to change. What we find today–can be different tomorrow. One piece of incorrect data changes the entire results. It can be very innocent or duplicitous.
@TZCA
And you were probaly one of those who believed in the Fox News predictions based on their fantasy Math.
Faith3
Posted November 12, 2012 at 1:30 PM
I stated rather clearly the word “neoliberal” policy which is not at all related to topic of Austerity.
*******
Ok, but this is bordering on semantics, in my humble opinion.
@Mark2LMAO, are you serious?! You have no idea how much Math we use to calculate Geometric Mean.
Yes I am serious. You are now in an area that I am very familiar with.
No, not at all.
@TCZA and Letmethink
Is this the type of Math you guys use?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1lJ3tfQFpc
Mark2
Posted November 12, 2012 at 1:36 PM
And you were probaly one of those who believed in the Fox News predictions based on their fantasy Math.
*******
Unfortunately for me, I didn’t think Romney would win. If he did, I knew it would be very close. I wasn’t excited by Romney and most of my conservative (repubulican-leaning) friends weren’t either. But I am opposed to most of what I know about Obama and his worldviews that define him. I knew that most of the votes for Romney would be votes against Obama, and this isn’t enough.
Two different policies.
and two different topics.