Live + Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for Tuesday, January 8, 2013
| P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) | ||
| Total Day | ||||
| FNC | 1,124 | 218 | 427 | |
| CNN | 348 | 91 | 137 | |
| MSNBC | 500 | 150 | 241 | |
| CNBC | 155 | 46 | 75 | |
| FBN | 56 | 16 | 29 | |
| HLN | 195 | 70 | 112 | |
| Primetime | P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) | |
| FNC | 1,873 | 321 | 590 | |
| CNN | 625 | 189 | 247 | |
| MSNBC | 901 | 240 | 454 | |
| CNBC | 240 | 91 | 137 | |
| FBN | 47 | 8 | 20 | |
| HLN | 305 | 116 | 176 | |
| Net | Morning programs (6-9 AM) | P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) |
| FNC | FOX & Friends | 1,053 | 229 | 462 |
| CNN | Early Start/Starting Point | 200 | 85 | 96 |
| MSNBC | Morning Joe | 445 | 155 | 258 |
| CNBC | Squawk Box | 93 | 24 | 47 |
| HLN | Morning Express w/ Meade | 246 | 103 | 154 |
| Net | 5PM | P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) |
| FNC | FIVE, THE | 1,918 | 361 | 682 |
| CNN | Situation Room | 549 | 90 | 170 |
| MSNBC | HARDBALL WITH C. MATTHEWS | 942 | 247 | 426 |
| CNBC | FAST MONEY | 166 | 58 | 95 |
| HLN | EVENING EXPRESS | 106 | 45 | 75 |
| Net | 6PM | P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) |
| FNC | SPECIAL RPT W/BRET BAIER | 2,049 | 312 | 706 |
| CNN | Situation Room | 508 | 108 | 172 |
| MSNBC | POLITICS NATION | 703 | 191 | 309 |
| CNBC | Mad Money | 117 | 50 | 67 |
| HLN | EVENING EXPRESS | 128 | 55 | 80 |
| Net | 7PM | P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) |
| FNC | The Fox Report W/S.SMITH | 1,776 | 348 | 630 |
| CNN | ERIN BURNETT OUTFRONT | 452 | 152 | 184 |
| MSNBC | HARDBALL WITH C. MATTHEWS | 815 | 215 | 352 |
| CNBC | Kudlow Report | 85 | 28 | 30 |
| HLN | JANE VELEZ-MITCHELL | 214 | 130 | 143 |
| Net | 8PM | P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) |
| FNC | THE OREILLY FACTOR | 2,523 | 393 | 710 |
| CNN | Anderson Cooper 360 | 659 | 209 | 263 |
| MSNBC | Ed Show | 854 | 193 | 381 |
| CNBC | SUPERMARKETS INC | 173 | 96 | 91 |
| HLN | Nancy Grace | 305 | 131 | 194 |
| Net | 9PM | P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) |
| FNC | Hannity | 1,861 | 342 | 618 |
| CNN | Piers Morgan Tonight | 797 | 225 | 300 |
| MSNBC | Rachel Maddow Show | 983 | 304 | 561 |
| CNBC | 60 Minutes ON CNBC | 246 | 66 | 127 |
| HLN | Dr. Drew ON CALL | 297 | 105 | 168 |
| Net | 10PM | P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) |
| FNC | ON THE RECORD W/GRETA | 1,231 | 229 | 438 |
| CNN | Anderson Cooper 360 | 418 | 133 | 177 |
| MSNBC | Last Word W/ L. ODONNELL | 866 | 222 | 417 |
| CNBC | AMERICAN GREED | 300 | 109 | 191 |
| HLN | Nancy Grace | 313 | 111 | 165 |
| Net | 11PM | P2+ (000s) | 25-54 (000s) | 35-64 (000s) |
| FNC | THE OREILLY FACTOR | 1,024 | 245 | 462 |
| CNN | ERIN BURNETT OUTFRONT | 245 | 85 | 89 |
| MSNBC | Ed Show | 462 | 144 | 214 |
| CNBC | Mad Money | 112 | 66 | 76 |
| HLN | SHOWBIZ TONIGHT | 219 | 97 | 112 |
-
For other days cable news ratings click here.P2+ = viewers over the age of 2 (25-54) = Adults 25-54 viewing (35-64) = Adults 35-64 viewingPrime Time = 8-11pmLIVE+SD: The number that watched a program either while it was broadcast OR watched via DVR on the same day [through 3AM the next day] the program was broadcast. For more information see Numbers 101.Scratch = when a show's audience fails to meet minimum Nielsen reporting levels. For more information go here.Nielsen Cable Network Coverage Estimates (as of July, 2012)CNN/HLN: 99.727 million HHsCNBC: 97.497 million HHsFNC: 97.981 million HHsMSNBC: 95.526 million HHsFox Business: 68.407 million HHsNielsen TV Ratings Data: ©2013 The Nielsen Company. All Rights Reserved.
another win for hannity
Things are going back to normal ratings wise. MSLSD ratings bump was short lived.
So usa8888, who was playing football LAST night??????
cant fix stupid!!
Is O’Reilly on vacation?
morgan profiting from the nutjob
@ Matthew
Posted January 9, 2013 at 1:56 PM
Is O’Reilly on vacation?
I dont think so but not sure. They all seem to be falling into the pre-election frenzy numbers. The only one that really has held on to the additional viewers is The Five.
I have been watching Brett at 6 and then changing over to non-news/politics for a breather!
‘AC360′ beat ‘Ed Show’ in the “very important key demo”.
Matthew wrote: “Is O’Reilly on vacation?”
He’s not on vacation.
@ AppleStinx
Posted January 9, 2013 at 2:17 PM
‘AC360? beat ‘Ed Show’ in the “very important key demo”.
thats cuz somewhere there was a big bridge tournement so the viewers did not tune in!
Early Start/Starting Point just barely got 200 today.
Copied from Monday
Matthew the studies show a decade trend that shows little to no heating and some cooling. You may spin it however you please.
I tend to question anything that is rampant with fraud, and has people like Al Gore and banks like Goldman-Sachs pushing it for financial gain.
When scientist are denied funding and refused the right to publish in scientific journals if their results do not conform to the global warming scenario that is also a red flag that something is wrong.
To date 47,000 scientist have signed a petition asking Congress to deny the Kyoto agreement because there is not sufficient evidence that global warming is indeed happening.
Harold Lewis Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of California is but one of many distinguished professors who have resigned from APS. If you are interested you can read his resignation letter. It is eye opening and just reaffirms my belief that anything that has trillions of dollars attached to it and is pushed by the UN, Al Gore, Michael Moore and on and on needs to be questioned or else we will find ourselves drowning in even more taxes, federal and God forbid— UN regulations.
I’m sure we will never agree Matthew and you can find data to refute what I post and vise versa. I can never buy into and support something that has been so corrupted. The fact that they had to change the name from global warming to climate change to cover their bases must make one suspicious. BTW, one study showed that by changing the name only 26% questioned it as opposed to 42% when it is called global warming—good grief.
Gone for the night. Ck you tomorrow.
Responding to Letmethink from the previous thread:
No, ‘they’ don’t. What you are saying is not a matter of opinion: you are wrong. You are factually incorrect. Please post the RSS or UAH data that shows 2000 – 2009 was cooler than 1990 – 1999.
If you’re dishonest you can use an extraordinarily hot El Nino year (1998) as your baseline, to claim that there is no warming; this, of course, isn’t factually accurate, but on a graph it certainly would look compelling to a layman. The problem is that long-term trends don’t agree; Of the top 10 warmest years globally, 9 were in the 2000s, one in the 1990s. If we’re in a cooling trend, why were the 2000s so warm?
As an aggregate of data, the positive temperature anomaly (aka warming) for 2000 – 2009 was 41% greater than the anomaly for 1990 – 2009. How, then, do you claim cooling?
Good old FOX.Every right wing-nut in the country watches them.
The hard fact is they have lost 1000000 viewers a week.The nut jobs are getting to be fewer and fewer as proven by Presidents Obama’s re-election.
Do your homework. That petition’s credentials have been thoroughly debunked – signatories have no burden to authenticate their claimed credentials, and even by that very low standard, less than one fourth of signatories even CLAIM to have PHDs, and fewer than 0.5% of signatories even CLAIM to have atmospheric sciences as their area of expertise. In other words, that petition is beyond meaningless, especially in comparison to the bulk of peer-reviewed work (of which, over 97% aligns with AGW theory).
Do your homework. “They” didn’t change the name from global warming to climate change. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has existed since the 80s, and the phrase climate change was used in scientific literature throughout the 80s as well. The ‘they’ that you are looking for who popularized the phrase climate change over global warming in the 2000s is Frank Luntz, on behalf of the Bush administration, who felt the implications of the phrase ‘climate change’ were less dire. No, I’m not joking.
I look forward to your full list of credentialed climate scientists who’ve had their works rejected on the basis that you’re claiming. Hell, give me ANY credentialed climate scientist whatsoever who is also a denialist. The denialist movement seems to mostly cling to people like Watts (a ‘meteorologist’ who flunked undergrad) as their ‘experts.’
Anyone remember when Fox News put Al Gores book in the snow and went on for almost an hour, trying to call global warming fake just because it was snowing in the NE? That was funny.
I love that you debate people in here Mathew, but I’ve seem to not understand the point anymore. I tried it at first but they just always come up with an excuse or false information, that I can prove is false in under 2 minutes, to try to prove their point and once you prove them wrong, they MAGICALLY disappear to just come back with another copy and paste with more false information.
Because I like arguing with/insulting people.
You should just have the whole anti climate change copy and pasted, this crap is brought up at least once a week. Especially the “LOOK AT ALL THE SCIENTISTS THAT SIGNED SO AND SO THAT DON’T BELIEVE IN GLOBAL WARMING!!!”
BTW – I harbor no delusion that I’m changing minds. If the weight of expertise and 30+ years of science isn’t enough to sway these knuckleheads, no Internet argument is going to change their minds either. These are dogmatic thinkers who have decided what reality is, and even if they woke up tomorrow and found themselves in an unlivable superheated desert, with their last breathes they’d gasp “It’s sunspots! It’s cosmic rays! There’s nothing I could have done!”
It just so happens that I have a low tolerance for blatant lies – the ‘no warming’ and ‘they changed the name to Climate Change’ being two frequent, and pathetic ones.
So…Everything goes back to Normal…no Kidding…FOX Smashes the (ahem)
“competition”.
It was a good year in primetime for everybody but CNN. On an annual basis, MSNBC was up 16 percent, Fox News was up 9 percent while CNN was down 2 percent. In the 18-49 demographics, Fox News was up 3 percent, MSNBC 17 percent and CNN 2 percent, while among the 25-54s, Fox News was down 2 percent, MSNBC was up 17 percent and CNN was down 1 percent. It’s obvious that MSNBC had the best and CNN had the worst, with Fox News middling along.
In total program day, Fox News was up 7 percent, MSNBC up 14 percent and CNN down 13 percent. Demographics: 18-49s, Fox News up 3 percent, MSNBC up 8 percent, CNN down 15 percent, and in 25-54s, Fox News actually dropped 1 percent, CNN dropped 17 percent while MSNBC picked up 12 percent.