'

Cable News Ratings for Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Categories: '

Written By

January 9th, 2013

 

Live + Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for Tuesday, January 8, 2013

P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
Total Day
FNC       1,124            218            427
CNN         348             91            137
MSNBC         500            150            241
CNBC         155             46             75
FBN           56             16             29
HLN         195             70            112
Primetime P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC       1,873            321            590
CNN         625            189            247
MSNBC         901            240            454
CNBC         240             91            137
FBN           47               8             20
HLN         305            116            176
Net Morning programs (6-9 AM) P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC FOX & Friends       1,053            229            462
CNN Early Start/Starting Point         200             85             96
MSNBC Morning Joe         445            155            258
CNBC Squawk Box           93             24             47
HLN Morning Express w/ Meade         246            103            154
Net 5PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC FIVE, THE       1,918            361            682
CNN Situation Room         549             90            170
MSNBC Hardball WITH C. MATTHEWS         942            247            426
CNBC FAST MONEY         166             58             95
HLN EVENING EXPRESS         106             45             75
Net 6PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC SPECIAL RPT W/BRET BAIER       2,049            312            706
CNN Situation Room         508            108            172
MSNBC POLITICS NATION         703            191            309
CNBC Mad Money         117             50             67
HLN EVENING EXPRESS         128             55             80
Net 7PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC The Fox Report W/S.SMITH       1,776            348            630
CNN ERIN BURNETT OUTFRONT         452            152            184
MSNBC Hardball WITH C. MATTHEWS         815            215            352
CNBC Kudlow Report           85             28             30
HLN JANE VELEZ-MITCHELL         214            130            143
Net 8PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC THE OREILLY FACTOR       2,523            393            710
CNN Anderson Cooper 360         659            209            263
MSNBC Ed Show         854            193            381
CNBC SUPERMARKETS INC         173             96             91
HLN Nancy Grace         305            131            194
Net 9PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC Hannity       1,861            342            618
CNN Piers Morgan Tonight         797            225            300
MSNBC Rachel Maddow Show         983            304            561
CNBC 60 Minutes ON CNBC         246             66            127
HLN Dr. Drew ON CALL         297            105            168
Net 10PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC ON THE RECORD W/GRETA       1,231            229            438
CNN Anderson Cooper 360         418            133            177
MSNBC Last Word W/ L. ODONNELL         866            222            417
CNBC AMERICAN GREED         300            109            191
HLN Nancy Grace         313            111            165
Net 11PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC THE OREILLY FACTOR       1,024            245            462
CNN ERIN BURNETT OUTFRONT         245             85             89
MSNBC Ed Show         462            144            214
CNBC Mad Money         112             66             76
HLN SHOWBIZ TONIGHT         219             97            112

-
For other days cable news ratings click here.P2+ = viewers over the age of 2 (25-54) = Adults 25-54 viewing (35-64) = Adults 35-64 viewingPrime Time = 8-11pmLIVE+SD: The number that watched a program either while it was broadcast OR watched via DVR on the same day [through 3AM the next day] the program was broadcast. For more information see Numbers 101.Scratch = when a show's audience fails to meet minimum Nielsen reporting levels. For more information go here.Nielsen Cable Network Coverage Estimates (as of July, 2012)CNN/HLN: 99.727 million HHsCNBC: 97.497 million HHsFNC: 97.981 million HHsMSNBC: 95.526 million HHsFox Business: 68.407 million HHsNielsen TV Ratings Data: ©2013 The Nielsen Company. All Rights Reserved.

 
  • 1966

    another win for hannity

  • Tama

    Things are going back to normal ratings wise. MSLSD ratings bump was short lived.

  • Ratboy

    So usa8888, who was playing football LAST night??????

    cant fix stupid!!

  • Matthew

    Is O’Reilly on vacation?

  • dadea

    morgan profiting from the nutjob

  • Ratboy

    @ Matthew
    Posted January 9, 2013 at 1:56 PM
    Is O’Reilly on vacation?

    I dont think so but not sure. They all seem to be falling into the pre-election frenzy numbers. The only one that really has held on to the additional viewers is The Five.

    I have been watching Brett at 6 and then changing over to non-news/politics for a breather!

  • AppleStinx

    ‘AC360′ beat ‘Ed Show’ in the “very important key demo”. :lol:

  • AppleStinx

    Matthew wrote: “Is O’Reilly on vacation?”

    He’s not on vacation.

  • Ratboy

    @ AppleStinx
    Posted January 9, 2013 at 2:17 PM
    ‘AC360? beat ‘Ed Show’ in the “very important key demo”.

    thats cuz somewhere there was a big bridge tournement so the viewers did not tune in! :shock:

  • Letmethink

    Early Start/Starting Point just barely got 200 today.
    Copied from Monday
    Matthew the studies show a decade trend that shows little to no heating and some cooling. You may spin it however you please.
    I tend to question anything that is rampant with fraud, and has people like Al Gore and banks like Goldman-Sachs pushing it for financial gain.
    When scientist are denied funding and refused the right to publish in scientific journals if their results do not conform to the global warming scenario that is also a red flag that something is wrong.
    To date 47,000 scientist have signed a petition asking Congress to deny the Kyoto agreement because there is not sufficient evidence that global warming is indeed happening.
    Harold Lewis Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of California is but one of many distinguished professors who have resigned from APS. If you are interested you can read his resignation letter. It is eye opening and just reaffirms my belief that anything that has trillions of dollars attached to it and is pushed by the UN, Al Gore, Michael Moore and on and on needs to be questioned or else we will find ourselves drowning in even more taxes, federal and God forbid— UN regulations.
    I’m sure we will never agree Matthew and you can find data to refute what I post and vise versa. I can never buy into and support something that has been so corrupted. The fact that they had to change the name from global warming to climate change to cover their bases must make one suspicious. BTW, one study showed that by changing the name only 26% questioned it as opposed to 42% when it is called global warming—good grief.
    Gone for the night. Ck you tomorrow.

  • Matthew

    Responding to Letmethink from the previous thread:

    Matthew they show a decade trend that shows little to no heating and some cooling. You may spin it however you please.

    No, ‘they’ don’t. What you are saying is not a matter of opinion: you are wrong. You are factually incorrect. Please post the RSS or UAH data that shows 2000 – 2009 was cooler than 1990 – 1999.

    If you’re dishonest you can use an extraordinarily hot El Nino year (1998) as your baseline, to claim that there is no warming; this, of course, isn’t factually accurate, but on a graph it certainly would look compelling to a layman. The problem is that long-term trends don’t agree; Of the top 10 warmest years globally, 9 were in the 2000s, one in the 1990s. If we’re in a cooling trend, why were the 2000s so warm?

    As an aggregate of data, the positive temperature anomaly (aka warming) for 2000 – 2009 was 41% greater than the anomaly for 1990 – 2009. How, then, do you claim cooling?

  • Dave

    Good old FOX.Every right wing-nut in the country watches them.
    The hard fact is they have lost 1000000 viewers a week.The nut jobs are getting to be fewer and fewer as proven by Presidents Obama’s re-election.

  • Matthew

    To date 47,000 scientist have signed a petition asking Congress to deny the Kyoto agreement because there is not sufficient evidence that global warming is indeed happening.

    Do your homework. That petition’s credentials have been thoroughly debunked – signatories have no burden to authenticate their claimed credentials, and even by that very low standard, less than one fourth of signatories even CLAIM to have PHDs, and fewer than 0.5% of signatories even CLAIM to have atmospheric sciences as their area of expertise. In other words, that petition is beyond meaningless, especially in comparison to the bulk of peer-reviewed work (of which, over 97% aligns with AGW theory).

    The fact that they had to change the name from global warming to climate change to cover their bases must make one suspicious.

    Do your homework. “They” didn’t change the name from global warming to climate change. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has existed since the 80s, and the phrase climate change was used in scientific literature throughout the 80s as well. The ‘they’ that you are looking for who popularized the phrase climate change over global warming in the 2000s is Frank Luntz, on behalf of the Bush administration, who felt the implications of the phrase ‘climate change’ were less dire. No, I’m not joking.

    When scientist are denied funding and refused the right to publish in scientific journals if their results do not conform to the global warming scenario that is also a red flag that something is wrong.

    I look forward to your full list of credentialed climate scientists who’ve had their works rejected on the basis that you’re claiming. Hell, give me ANY credentialed climate scientist whatsoever who is also a denialist. The denialist movement seems to mostly cling to people like Watts (a ‘meteorologist’ who flunked undergrad) as their ‘experts.’

  • RedBarSoup

    Anyone remember when Fox News put Al Gores book in the snow and went on for almost an hour, trying to call global warming fake just because it was snowing in the NE? That was funny.

  • RedBarSoup

    I love that you debate people in here Mathew, but I’ve seem to not understand the point anymore. I tried it at first but they just always come up with an excuse or false information, that I can prove is false in under 2 minutes, to try to prove their point and once you prove them wrong, they MAGICALLY disappear to just come back with another copy and paste with more false information.

  • Matthew

    Because I like arguing with/insulting people.

  • RedBarSoup

    You should just have the whole anti climate change copy and pasted, this crap is brought up at least once a week. Especially the “LOOK AT ALL THE SCIENTISTS THAT SIGNED SO AND SO THAT DON’T BELIEVE IN GLOBAL WARMING!!!”

  • Matthew

    BTW – I harbor no delusion that I’m changing minds. If the weight of expertise and 30+ years of science isn’t enough to sway these knuckleheads, no Internet argument is going to change their minds either. These are dogmatic thinkers who have decided what reality is, and even if they woke up tomorrow and found themselves in an unlivable superheated desert, with their last breathes they’d gasp “It’s sunspots! It’s cosmic rays! There’s nothing I could have done!”

    It just so happens that I have a low tolerance for blatant lies – the ‘no warming’ and ‘they changed the name to Climate Change’ being two frequent, and pathetic ones.

  • betty

    So…Everything goes back to Normal…no Kidding…FOX Smashes the (ahem)
    “competition”.

  • Mark2

    It was a good year in primetime for everybody but CNN. On an annual basis, MSNBC was up 16 percent, Fox News was up 9 percent while CNN was down 2 percent. In the 18-49 demographics, Fox News was up 3 percent, MSNBC 17 percent and CNN 2 percent, while among the 25-54s, Fox News was down 2 percent, MSNBC was up 17 percent and CNN was down 1 percent. It’s obvious that MSNBC had the best and CNN had the worst, with Fox News middling along.

    In total program day, Fox News was up 7 percent, MSNBC up 14 percent and CNN down 13 percent. Demographics: 18-49s, Fox News up 3 percent, MSNBC up 8 percent, CNN down 15 percent, and in 25-54s, Fox News actually dropped 1 percent, CNN dropped 17 percent while MSNBC picked up 12 percent.

© 2014 Tribune Digital Ventures