'

Cable News Ratings for Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Categories: '

Written By

January 10th, 2013

 

Live + Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for Wednesday, January 9, 2013

P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
Total Day
FNC        1,178        242         486
CNN           356        100         152
MSNBC           521        166         249
CNBC           174         51           86
FBN             52         15           28
HLN           183         74         100
Primetime P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC        2,263        385         797
CNN           499        133         232
MSNBC           989        242         431
CNBC           227         77         116
FBN             52         17           27
HLN           311        119         170
Net Morning programs (6-9 AM) P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC FOX & Friends        1,095        248         503
CNN Early Start/Starting Point           270         85         141
MSNBC Morning Joe           496        207         280
CNBC Squawk Box           127         45           59
HLN Morning Express w/ Meade           172         90         116
Net 5PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC FIVE, THE        1,916        361         707
CNN Situation Room           477        104         174
MSNBC Hardball WITH C. MATTHEWS           885        242         397
CNBC FAST MONEY           195         27           88
HLN EVENING EXPRESS           171         55           57
Net 6PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC SPECIAL RPT W/BRET BAIER        1,831        321         700
CNN Situation Room           376         93         154
MSNBC POLITICS NATION           856        227         351
CNBC Mad Money           229         55         101
HLN EVENING EXPRESS           199         60           79
Net 7PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC The Fox Report W/S.SMITH        1,684        306         731
CNN ERIN BURNETT OUTFRONT           382        134         156
MSNBC Hardball WITH C. MATTHEWS           854        190         359
CNBC Kudlow Report           166         51           49
HLN JANE VELEZ-MITCHELL           231         90         108
Net 8PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC THE OREILLY FACTOR        3,152        492       1,139
CNN Anderson Cooper 360           441        111         208
MSNBC Ed Show           972        208         378
CNBC FILTHY RICH           228         66           96
HLN Nancy Grace           415        180         240
Net 9PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC Hannity        2,057        388         714
CNN Piers Morgan Tonight           614        134         277
MSNBC Rachel Maddow Show        1,028        268         477
CNBC AMER GREED THE FUGITIVES           214         82         113
HLN Dr. Drew ON CALL           303        119         156
Net 10PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC ON THE RECORD W/GRETA 1569 274 528
CNN Anderson Cooper 360 443 153 211
MSNBC Last Word W/ L. ODONNELL 964 252 439
CNBC AMERICAN GREED 238 81 140
HLN Nancy Grace 215 59 114
Net 11PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC THE OREILLY FACTOR        1,127        325         495
CNN ERIN BURNETT OUTFRONT           343        128         158
MSNBC Ed Show           372        124         205
CNBC Mad Money           103         42           61
HLN SHOWBIZ TONIGHT           228         90         116

-
For other days cable news ratings click here.P2+ = viewers over the age of 2 (25-54) = Adults 25-54 viewing (35-64) = Adults 35-64 viewingPrime Time = 8-11pmLIVE+SD: The number that watched a program either while it was broadcast OR watched via DVR on the same day [through 3AM the next day] the program was broadcast. For more information see Numbers 101.Scratch = when a show's audience fails to meet minimum Nielsen reporting levels. For more information go here.Nielsen Cable Network Coverage Estimates (as of July, 2012)CNN/HLN: 99.727 million HHsCNBC: 97.497 million HHsFNC: 97.981 million HHsMSNBC: 95.526 million HHsFox Business: 68.407 million HHsNielsen TV Ratings Data: ©2012 The Nielsen Company. All Rights Reserved.

 
  • Letmethink

    dd Are you familiar with the plight of this family from Tennessee? They have a Facebook page; Pray for the Neville’s. The dad posts each day and they have thousands of supporters helping them out. It is really a touching story and shows that there is still a lot of good in the work.
    http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/Support-Spread-Across-Country-for-Former-Arlington-Family-181081581.html

  • cathy

    Matthew:

    link for some of the rules; http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/evolution-cable-television
    This link is tells you how to send a complaint to the FCC about fox news. http://foxnewsboycott.com/resources/contact-the-fcc/

    Most of what I said come from Marketing, Communication and broadcast law classes I took while getting my majors. I know that cable rules are different then standard broadcasting. I know the FCC can fine for ethical violations. But if cable was unrestricted as you say, I believe we would have free p*rn stations.
    A newscaster is allowed to give an opinion.
    And yes I was speaking of slander when comparing what you call your show. Because Steward has a satire show (comedy) he can say almost anything and not be sued for slander. It was all done in humor after all and it was clearly stated as so by the type of show and channel it’s on. The same standard doesn’t apply to O’Reilly.
    That being said. There is a big difference between saying “John Doe is a racist *ss with the IQ of a pea.” and saying “Joe Doe spits at every black person he passes and he was in special education classes in school.”

  • Letmethink

    Early Start/Starting Point— 270 wow–what was happening on the show that day?–still dismal numbers

  • Letmethink

    One more post about Ian Weiss and then I will give it up for the day; This regarding the scientific method–

    An idea worth spreading
    The scientific method isn’t applied with enough rigor to the world’s most important questions. Scholars and laypeople alike tend to continue believing that certain hypotheses (H) are viable even after empirical data has disconfirmed the Hs’ most important predictions, or after the reasoning on which they were founded has crumbled in light of new evidence. There are several “traps” that make this occur: The H is so terrifying that we panic about it rather than investigate it; the H is so uplifting or politically convenient that we don’t want to believe otherwise; it’s null H threatens to undermine our sacred ideological convictions, so we feel the H “must” be true; our career, community, or lifestyle is dependent on the H being accepted, so to admit that it’s false would be to admit that we need to make major adjustments to our lives; the null H is too counterintuitive to take seriously; it seems that every credible expert believes the H to be true; the people we trust think H is true.

  • cathy

    It’s ok. Matthew. Jackson had a cool nickname and people like the song “1814”

  • Raz

    Hoppy, that was sooooo bad, but so darn good! Must bring that one home.

  • cathy

    Letmethink, I look your scientific method post. People put to much trust in the ‘most credible expert’. We forget how many times yesterdays, ‘most credible expert’ becomes todays, washed up scientists.

  • Hillbilly

    @Pippa

    Person of Interest won it’s time slot. :) Let’s hope it still does when the final numbers come out.

  • Hillbilly
  • Letmethink

    @Cathy Letmethink, I look your scientific method post. People put to much trust in the ‘most credible expert’. We forget how many times yesterdays, ‘most credible expert’ becomes todays, washed up scientists.

    Absolutely—I see many reasons in that post that would explain why people will accept something whole heartedly regardless of whether there is sufficient and factual data to support it. BTW, the scientific method post was not mine. It was from the the guy I mentioned— Ian Weiss. He is a college senior but I am always impressed when I read his posts or anything he writes. He is always analytical, well reasoned and unflappable–.
    I am so glad you are interested in AGW also. It is an interesting topic to discuss and share info.
    BTW, where is BevAg?

  • Hillbilly

    AppleStinx – The Hendrix’s estate has unreleased music by him 40+ years after his death?? They’ll never stop milking the old cow. Maybe it’s just him playing ukulele.

    ————————————–

    I wonder how much CBS paid for it? I scanned through the comments & folks aren’t holding their breath for it being anything good. Take it to Pawn Stars..Chumlee will buy it for big $! ;)

  • Hillbilly

    Hoppy
    Posted January 11, 2013 at 10:40 AM
    Barack: How’s Hillary’s head?
    Bill: Well, she’s no Monica.

    ————————-

    :lol: :lol: :lol:

  • Hillbilly

    Matthew – There has always been droughts, and there will always be droughts, but frequency and severity do tie into

    ——————

    I disagree. No GW (not like today) & droughts were worse in the past. I know there’s paper’s & sources on both sides of the issue. Why didn’t the USA have a nasty drought (like 2012) in 2010? 2010 was warmer.

    When did it ‘cut the other way?’ 2000 – 2009

    Trends don’t have to start & stop on even years…1900 – 1910, 2000 – 2009, etc. If there’s been no warming say from 1953 – 1963 it’s still a 10 year trend. My point on trends is the length of time one considers a trend. The supporters or should i say some like Phil Jones for one, say 10 year trends mean nothing.

  • Letmethink

    Hillbilly, I pulled up behind a truck last week that said Hillbilly Home Repair. Have you moved to Texas? If so, I have some home repair work for you.

  • Hillbilly

    Letmethink – There were a few commenters that made comments not in support of the ideas Hansen’s presented in the speech. Most of them dropped out quickly as they were ridiculed mercilessly.

    ——————-

    Was you here when Boris was?

  • Letmethink

    by Roy Spencer
    2012 was a scorcher, but was it the warmest year ever?
    A report released this week by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA) called it “the warmest year ever for the nation.” Experts agree that 2012 was a hot year for the planet. But it’s that report — and the agency itself — that’s drawing the most heat today.
    “2012 [wasn’t] necessarily warmer than it was back in the 1930s … NOAA has made so many adjustments to the data it’s ridiculous,”

  • Letmethink

    No I don’t remember him. Was he warmer or skeptic?

  • Doug Z

    Mathhew

    I was writing about Andrew Johnson. He was trying to do what Lincoln wanted to do. Not get even with the south and slavery freedom .

  • Matthew

    I disagree. No GW (not like today) & droughts were worse in the past. I know there’s paper’s & sources on both sides of the issue. Why didn’t the USA have a nasty drought (like 2012) in 2010? 2010 was warmer.

    This isn’t true. The 2012 drought was worse financially (adjusted for inflation) than the 1930s droughts, and there WAS a nasty drought in 2010; the U.S. has had several years of increasingly bad drought, my area has had water restriction rules in place for years, and in 2010 China had one of the worst droughts in it’s history, complete with dust storms.

    My point on trends is the length of time one considers a trend. The supporters or should i say some like Phil Jones for one, say 10 year trends mean nothing.

    The last ten years were warmer than the previous ten. That’s a warming trend, and it continues the trend of 90s being warmer than the 80s, and the 80s being warmer than the 70s. That is a long-term, multi-decade trend. Roy Spencer, who has already been cited here, even acknowledges a 2000 – 2009 positive warming anomaly; not as dire as IPCC projected, and he disagrees with the mainstream about why there was a positive heat anomaly, but on the basic fact that warming has occurred, he still agrees with the consensus of data.

  • Doug Z

    Hillbilly
    Posted January 11, 2013 at 1:28 PM

    Matthew – There has always been droughts, and there will always be droughts, but frequency and severity do tie into

    Global cooling will wipe out Empires as in the past. Warming has always been good to mankind.

© 2014 Tribune Digital Ventures