'

Cable News Ratings for Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Categories: '

Written By

January 10th, 2013

 

Live + Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for Wednesday, January 9, 2013

P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
Total Day
FNC        1,178        242         486
CNN           356        100         152
MSNBC           521        166         249
CNBC           174         51           86
FBN             52         15           28
HLN           183         74         100
Primetime P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC        2,263        385         797
CNN           499        133         232
MSNBC           989        242         431
CNBC           227         77         116
FBN             52         17           27
HLN           311        119         170
Net Morning programs (6-9 AM) P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC FOX & Friends        1,095        248         503
CNN Early Start/Starting Point           270         85         141
MSNBC Morning Joe           496        207         280
CNBC Squawk Box           127         45           59
HLN Morning Express w/ Meade           172         90         116
Net 5PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC FIVE, THE        1,916        361         707
CNN Situation Room           477        104         174
MSNBC Hardball WITH C. MATTHEWS           885        242         397
CNBC FAST MONEY           195         27           88
HLN EVENING EXPRESS           171         55           57
Net 6PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC SPECIAL RPT W/BRET BAIER        1,831        321         700
CNN Situation Room           376         93         154
MSNBC POLITICS NATION           856        227         351
CNBC Mad Money           229         55         101
HLN EVENING EXPRESS           199         60           79
Net 7PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC The Fox Report W/S.SMITH        1,684        306         731
CNN ERIN BURNETT OUTFRONT           382        134         156
MSNBC Hardball WITH C. MATTHEWS           854        190         359
CNBC Kudlow Report           166         51           49
HLN JANE VELEZ-MITCHELL           231         90         108
Net 8PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC THE OREILLY FACTOR        3,152        492       1,139
CNN Anderson Cooper 360           441        111         208
MSNBC Ed Show           972        208         378
CNBC FILTHY RICH           228         66           96
HLN Nancy Grace           415        180         240
Net 9PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC Hannity        2,057        388         714
CNN Piers Morgan Tonight           614        134         277
MSNBC Rachel Maddow Show        1,028        268         477
CNBC AMER GREED THE FUGITIVES           214         82         113
HLN Dr. Drew ON CALL           303        119         156
Net 10PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC ON THE RECORD W/GRETA 1569 274 528
CNN Anderson Cooper 360 443 153 211
MSNBC Last Word W/ L. ODONNELL 964 252 439
CNBC AMERICAN GREED 238 81 140
HLN Nancy Grace 215 59 114
Net 11PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FNC THE OREILLY FACTOR        1,127        325         495
CNN ERIN BURNETT OUTFRONT           343        128         158
MSNBC Ed Show           372        124         205
CNBC Mad Money           103         42           61
HLN SHOWBIZ TONIGHT           228         90         116

-
For other days cable news ratings click here.P2+ = viewers over the age of 2 (25-54) = Adults 25-54 viewing (35-64) = Adults 35-64 viewingPrime Time = 8-11pmLIVE+SD: The number that watched a program either while it was broadcast OR watched via DVR on the same day [through 3AM the next day] the program was broadcast. For more information see Numbers 101.Scratch = when a show's audience fails to meet minimum Nielsen reporting levels. For more information go here.Nielsen Cable Network Coverage Estimates (as of July, 2012)CNN/HLN: 99.727 million HHsCNBC: 97.497 million HHsFNC: 97.981 million HHsMSNBC: 95.526 million HHsFox Business: 68.407 million HHsNielsen TV Ratings Data: ©2012 The Nielsen Company. All Rights Reserved.

 
  • Doug Z

    cathy
    Posted January 11, 2013 at 1:06 PM

    It’s ok. Matthew. Jackson had a cool nickname and people like the song “1814?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50_iRIcxsz0

    that was Stonewall not Andrew

  • Hillbilly

    Letmethink
    Posted January 11, 2013 at 1:29 PM
    Hillbilly, I pulled up behind a truck last week that said Hillbilly Home Repair. Have you moved to Texas? If so, I have some home repair work for you.

    ———————–

    Nope not in Texas. If you are single i could come to Texas & repair “anything” you need repaired. ;)

    This post well self destruct in 10 minutes so read it fast. If Faith3 reads it I’ll be in the dog house again. :mad:

    Talk to you sometime Saturday.

  • Matthew

    Absolutely—I see many reasons in that post that would explain why people will accept something whole heartedly regardless of whether there is sufficient and factual data to support it.

    Just because you personally feel AGW falls under this umbrella, that does not make it so. In terms of research and data, it’s one of the most well-understood, well-researched scientific phenomena of modern science. You can single out data sources and say “I don’t trust HADCRUT” or “I don’t trust GISS,” but when Hadcrut, argo, GISS, RSS, UAH, NCEP, ERA, and so on are all showing the same trend, and you’re trying to imply that they ALL are in on some collective fraud, you’re exiting the realm of common sense.

    If it were one, two, even three agencies and you were saying “I’m just not sure I should take this at face value,” maybe I’d accept that it’s just cautious skepticism; to reject the data of dozens of agencies, and tens of thousands of scientists, is willful self-delusion.

    @Cathy:

    We forget how many times yesterdays, ‘most credible expert’ becomes todays, washed up scientists.

    Sounds like an awfully convenient way to pick and choose your own reality, based on partisanship. That’s be like the gun control advocates here trying to BS away that data for gun ownership vs. gun homicides in Sweden, or anything else that undercuts their own arguments.

  • cathy

    letmethink, I believe bev is looking for homes in Texas and another state.

  • Matthew

    No I don’t remember him. Was he warmer or skeptic?

    Boris is a former poster who writes in the STEM field; in his youth, he worked in a lab researching cosmic rays. For reference, cosmic rays are also Roy Spencer’s area of interest in climatology, and he’s attempting (rather shoddily, thus far) to prove their role in climate change over anthropogenic forcings, an idea that Boris disagreed with. The significance of Boris missing is that he could more thoroughly shut down denialist arguments, because he actually fully understood the field.

  • cathy

    Doug Z, I’m puzzled “stonewall” jackson. Oh maybe I get it now. You mean Stonewall is a cooler nickname then “Old Hickory”.

    Matthew, you can sure read into a statement.
    “We forget how many times yesterdays, ‘most credible expert’ becomes todays, washed up scientists.”
    __________________________________________________________________________
    Sounds like an awfully convenient way to pick and choose your own reality, based on partisanship. That’s be like the gun control advocates here trying to BS away that data for gun ownership vs. gun homicides in Sweden, or anything else that undercuts their own arguments.
    ____________________________________________________________________________

    How do you see choosing my own reality base on partisanship in that statement. You like using that word partisanship.

    I don’t disagree with Global Warming for political reasons. What I believe is based on doing my research. I don’t believe a scientist or group of them just because someone says, “these are the most credible experts”.
    I’m a simple minded person. I hear Global warming and think. “Where, it is happening? Because I’m opening my pool later each year and closing it earlier because of the cold weather.” So, I decide to do some research.

  • Doug Z

    Mathhew

    I would think Americans are insane and not in Sweden . That is what everybody has a gun and nobody get killed.

  • Doug Z

    Matthew, Global warming is good for the human race. Look at history.Global cooling will bring down Empires, all of them fell from Global cooling

  • Hoppy

    @Doug Z” “That was Stonewall, not Andrew”

    Wrong.

© 2014 Tribune Digital Ventures